To: | "VR2BrettGraham" <vr2bg@harts.org.hk>, cq-contest@contesting.com |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [CQ-Contest] license class and m-m op's |
From: | "K0HB " <k-zero-hb@earthlink.net> |
Reply-to: | k-zero-hb@earthlink.net |
Date: | Wed, 11 May 2005 23:48:22 -00 |
List-post: | <mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com> |
-- http://www.home.earthlink.net/~k0hb > [Original Message] > From: VR2BrettGraham <vr2bg@harts.org.hk> > > More details needed, but it's only third party if the operator on either end > is not a duly authorized person or if the communications are on behalf > of someone else. > A "General" class licensee is not a "duly authorized person" in the "Extra" class portion of the band. He is therefor classified as a "third party". FCC doesn't care what you believe. 73, de Hans, K0HB _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ-M Question, Fabian Kurz |
---|---|
Next by Date: | [CQ-Contest] NAQCC 80/40 Meter Sprint for May, Larry Makoski W2LJ |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [CQ-Contest] license class and m-m op's, VR2BrettGraham |
Next by Thread: | Re: [CQ-Contest] license class and m-m op's, VR2BrettGraham |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |