To: | cq-contest@contesting.com |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Off Time |
From: | VR2BrettGraham <vr2bg@harts.org.hk> |
Date: | Thu, 17 Mar 2005 01:36:07 +0000 |
List-post: | <mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com> |
N6TR replied to K6LL: >And the beauty of the new process is that it is indeed consistent for >all of the players. <snip> >If you make a QSO at 0000 and again at 0030, how much off time did you >take? <snip> >Therefore, in the 0000 and 0030 example, you only have 29 minutes of off >time (0001 through 0029 inclusive). Okay, now I'm confused. What's "new"? I thought that was how off time was always calculated. ;^) 73, VR2BrettGraham _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | [CQ-Contest] Insulating Elevated Vertical in 4 Square, Ken Widelitz |
---|---|
Next by Date: | [CQ-Contest] Remembering the BEST TIMES at Multi-Multi Operations....., TOMK5RC |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Off Time, Tyler Stewart |
Next by Thread: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Off Time, Milt Jensen |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |