CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

RE: [CQ-Contest] ARRL v. contesters

To: cq-contest@contesting.com
Subject: RE: [CQ-Contest] ARRL v. contesters
From: Bill Tippett <btippett@alum.mit.edu>
Date: Wed, 08 Dec 2004 10:12:26 -0500
List-post: <mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
W0UN wrote:
>Nice bit of perspective -- thanks for the insights. Upon reflection it seems that
CONTESTING may be the ONE area that would MOST appeal to a younger
generation that has been raised on video games. Especially CW, where both
the pace and dexterity play a big role in success, much like that of a video
game.


>Contesting may need to become the featured aspect of ham radio to encourage
the youth of today to get a license. What is considered to be a scourge on the
bands by many non-contesters might hold the key to the survival of the hobby.

        I couldn't agree more John!  I would add one
other area which has recently become an interest of mine.
Portable QRP operating (i.e. combine radio with outdoor
activities like backpacking, camping, etc.)  My stepson is
22 and is home on leave from Iraq.  He is an avid backpacker
and has held a Tech license for a number of years, but has
never bothered to learn the code.  When I showed him my
AT Sprint II (8 ounce QRP station) and the Adventure Radio
Society's website below, he got very excited.  ARS also holds
monthly 2-hour Spartan Sprints which are a blast, especially
when you try it from an outdoor location.

http://www.arsqrp.com/

        Will be interesting to see if he follows through
when he returns permanently.

73, Bill W4ZV

_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>