| To: | CQ Contest <cq-contest@contesting.com> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Stimulating Participation was: Limited AntennaHeight Category |
| From: | "Kenneth E. Harker" <kenharker@kenharker.com> |
| Date: | Tue, 30 Nov 2004 11:30:00 -0800 |
| List-post: | <mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com> |
On Tue, Nov 30, 2004 at 01:01:16PM -0500, Pete Smith wrote: > Doesn't mean it isn't still a good idea, particularly > in the face of flat or declining participation in contests, which is why I > have brought it up again. Can you back up that assertion that contest activity is "flat or declining" with data? On HF, it is exactly the opposite of my personal observation. -- Kenneth E. Harker WM5R kenharker@kenharker.com http://www.kenharker.com/ _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest |
| Previous by Date: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Limited Antenna Height Category, Russell Hill |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Limited Antenna Height Category, PaulKB8N |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Stimulating Participation was: Limited AntennaHeight Category, Bill Turner |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Stimulating Participation was: LimitedAntenna Height Category, Pete Smith |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |