Ian -
Ever try N3FJP's contest software?? Never have to lift your hands off the
keyboard for that, it works flawlessly for me from Windows 98 to XP
Professional, runs smooth and fast, even on a Mac running Virtual PC (but I
use a Compaq laptop now).
It's simple to learn but still includes a help file anyway, simple to load
- only one file per contest, not a handful of different installs for each
contest each with different version numbers. Just download, install and run!
And Scott's customer care is too good to believe... Oh yeah, IT'S VERY
CHEAP!
73, Walter W2WJO
>
> By and large, DOS is dead. But TR rocks.. Hopefully we all know that, too ;)
> However, be it for good or bad, time marches on and Win based logging
> programs will probably become more and more the standard.
>
> Now, before I ask, let me say that I've NEVER used anything but TR and CT.
> The former by choice and preference, the latter because that's what we've
> got @ NQ4I (yes.. I've tried to sell Rick on TR. More than once;) Well,
> there was that one time I used -or tried to use- WriteLog during some now
> forgotten 'test.
>
> At any rate, I do seem to recall that WL was extremely "mouse heavy". By
> that I mean we were always having to dink with the mouse to activate a
> field, etc. Assuming that WL is not alone in it's reliance on a mouse, I
> gotta ask....
>
> WHY??!!!! Surely the same fields/tasks can be handled by keystokes(??).
> Maybe it's just me going on a prior less than favourable experience and
> perhaps things have changed. But i don't see why an op should have to take a
> hand off of the radio/keyboard/whatever just because he's using a Win based
> program.
>
> OK.. flame away;)
>
> 73,
> Ian, K5ZM
> --
> "Uh, this is no offense, but,uh... You are a robot, aren't you?"
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|