Why, that's nothing. Back in the days that the exchange was longer
(before 1970) I ran across some multioperator stations signing one
callsign and inserting another callsign into the exchange. Very
confusing, because the log sheets didn't have two columns for
callsigns. When I operated multioperator at WB6MSU around 1966 he
insisted I use my own check and birthday in the exchange, so we
changed our exchange information several times through the contest.
In those days we were pleased that the message text had been deleted
from the exchange. Frankly, the SS Sunday doldrums started when the
exchange was shortened in 71. Before then, in a CW SS you could
finish with a rate that was only 30% or so off from your first hour.
Of course, top scores had only about 40 contacts in the first hour...
----- Original Message -----
From: "Mike Fatchett, W0MU" <w0mu@w0mu.com>
To: "'John Laney'" <k4bai@worldnet.att.net>;
<cq-contest@contesting.com>
Sent: Monday, November 22, 2004 2:50 PM
Subject: RE: [CQ-Contest] SS Rules
> And what do Muti-ops do? Change their check each time the operator
changes?
>
> Mike
> W0MU
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: cq-contest-bounces@contesting.com
> [mailto:cq-contest-bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of John Laney
> Sent: Monday, November 22, 2004 12:05 PM
> To: cq-contest@contesting.com
> Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] SS Rules
>
> It isn't clear that the SS check is always the year of first
licensing of
> the station owner. Many may interpret it to be the year first
licensed of
> the station operator. What is clear is that it must be the same for
the
> station for the whole contest. If the station you mention had a
guest
> operator, he may have been using his own year of first licensing.
When I
> operated SS as a guest op at W4AN, I used my own check "54" instead
of
> Bill's check of "81" or whatever was his year of first licensing.
He
> advised me not to do that because his year was in a lot of computer
files,
> but I used my own anyway, just like I sent my name as "John" when I
was the
> only guest op at W4AN in NAQPs.
>
> Another possible explanation is temporary mental error. One station
gave me
> check "29" this weekend. I decided to ask, instead of just logging
what
> didn't seem to be correct for someone who wasn't a club or school
station.
> The reply was, "Oh, did I really say that? I meant to say "92."
>
> The important thing is that a two-digit number be sent for the
"check"
> and that it be the same for the whole contest. The "year first
licensed" is
> not clearly defined and I think it is OK for each person to define
it for
> himself or herself.
>
> 73,
>
>
> John, K4BAI.
>
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|