> I would be opposed to anything that shows actual QSO information for
the
> points you raise. In addition, such a system could result in a pseudo
> packet system. "Hey, W9WI just worked a 9M2 on 21005!".
>
> I would think real time QSO and multiplier totals would be
> sufficient. Delayed (1-2 hours?) band break downs might be
interesting
> without giving away too many strategies too soon.
Don't delay them, make real time mean 'real time'. Heck, with all the
spots its easy enough to find out who is on what band, what frequency
they are on, and if you want to waste the time you can go listen to what
they are working... or if you are good you put one vfo on them and see
if they are running faster than you are and try to figure out why.
You might be amazed sometime to find out how many ears are just
listening to the big multi's call cq. It is not unusual to hear someone
yell at a rare mult 'up 5' after they call you. And I know there are
many times when I have dialed up the band and heard a rare mult call
someone else and have quickly gone and called cq just up or down the
band hoping to snag them. So there is nothing really to hide.
David Robbins K1TTT
e-mail: mailto:k1ttt@arrl.net
web: http://www.k1ttt.net
AR-Cluster node: 145.69MHz or telnet://dxc.k1ttt.net
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|