Guess I was lucky. I have the 432 and have never had any problems. Now
use the internal keyer in the ProII.
Tom/KK4TA
-----Original Message-----
From: cq-contest-bounces@contesting.com
[mailto:cq-contest-bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of Mike McCarthy,
W1NR
Sent: Wednesday, November 10, 2004 8:42 AM
To: N2TK@arrl.net; Contest (E-mail)
Subject: RE: [CQ-Contest] Voice memory keyers
I found that the early MFJ was terrible with any kind of power. I know
of a few with the new model who claim it is much better. I have been
using a soundcard and WriteLog for some time, but that was quite an
exercise to get it clean of RFI as well.
Mike, W1NR
-----Original Message-----
From: cq-contest-bounces@contesting.com
[mailto:cq-contest-bounces@contesting.com]On Behalf Of N2TK, Tony
Sent: Wednesday, November 10, 2004 8:14 AM
To: Contest (E-mail); FRC (E-mail)
Subject: [CQ-Contest] Voice memory keyers
Looking for a good voice memory keyer. At WP2Z we have tried DVK's and
the earlier MFJ voice keyer. No matter how many caps and ferrite cores
we add we still get some interference. If we add a filter we may clean
up one band then cause problems on another band. Is there a recommended
voice keyer that the multis have had success? Tnx N2TK, Tony
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|