> [Original Message]
> From: Bill Tippett <btippett@alum.mit.edu>
> Add a column which shows total multipliers (Z+C)
> divided by total QSO's and see if anything looks odd.
I'm not sure what significance that math has (essentially it gives you the
inverse of "QSO's per Mult"), but I did the math and here are the numbers:
A61AJ 0.11
OE4A 0.16
FS/AH8DX 0.11
VO1AU 0.11
VO1MP 0.15
M6T 0.14
LY4A 0.20
DJ5MW 0.15
V55V 0.15
RZ9OZO 0.19
A different more interesting bit of math might
be to determine the average-points-per-Q
using the formula ---> (Score/(Z+C))/Q's
A61AJ 2.47
OE4A 2.30
FS/AH8DX 2.46
VO1AU 2.66
VO1MP 2.77
M6T 2.26
LY4A 1.95
DJ5MW 2.08
V55V 2.93
RZ9OZO 2.63
What this highlights is that high scoring stations work a lot of three
pointers (no kidding, Dick Tracy), and more interesting that all things
being equal (they never are) Namibia would be the best scoring QTH of all
those in the sample.
73, de Hans, K0HB
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|