I heard that football owners are getting plans set for their teams for the
next football season. I suggest that going into this next season for the games
this year each team should be spotted the point difference that they lost by
last year.. That would bring parity to the season faster then trying to get a
better team (or a better station). But then do we want a level playing field
or try to have everybody finish in a tie? Nah. Its to much like affirmative
action for radiosport to considered.
Jerry
W3DMB
In a message dated 3/31/04 4:02:34 AM !!!First Boot!!!, barry@mxg.com writes:
> I'm not penalizing broadcast stations that sit on
> one frequency making 100 Q's per hour; their
> year-to-year scoring would not be changed.
>
> I'm suggesting that non-CQing stations should receive
> 2x points for those contacts, because S&P rates are
> one half of the run rates.
>
> That would bring parity in scores for those that can
> run with those that can't, but still work just as hard.
>
---------------------------------------------------------------
The world's top contesters battle it out in Finland!
THE OFFICIAL FILM of WRTC 2002 now on professional DVD and VHS!
http://home1.pacific.net.sg/~jamesb/
---------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|