Yes, "Precedence" is a totally bizarre word anyway. I was guilty of
sending CK several times. "PWR?" was immediately obvious.
George W1EBI
-----Original Message-----
From: cq-contest-bounces@contesting.com
[mailto:cq-contest-bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of Eric Scace K3NA
Sent: Wednesday, November 05, 2003 7:29 AM
To: Mark Beckwith; cq-contest@contesting.com
Subject: RE: [CQ-Contest] SS beefs
I found "PWR?" worked as well as "PREC?" in getting fills during the
SS CW contest.
-- Eric K3NA
-----Original Message-----
From: cq-contest-bounces@contesting.com
[mailto:cq-contest-bounces@contesting.com]On Behalf Of Mark Beckwith
Sent: 2003 November 3 Monday 20:21
To: cq-contest@contesting.com
Subject: [CQ-Contest] SS beefs
[...snip...]
3. What on earth can we do to make "PREC?" easier for more people to
understand? If I shot myself for every time somebody either sent the
WRONG
thing or his WHOLE exchange when I asked "PREC?" this weekend I'd be out
of
bullets by now.
[...snip...]
Mark, N5OT
---------------------------------------------------------------
The world's top contesters battle it out in Finland!
THE OFFICIAL FILM of WRTC 2002 now on professional DVD and VHS!
http://home1.pacific.net.sg/~jamesb/
---------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
---------------------------------------------------------------
The world's top contesters battle it out in Finland!
THE OFFICIAL FILM of WRTC 2002 now on professional DVD and VHS!
http://home1.pacific.net.sg/~jamesb/
---------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|