CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

[CQ-Contest] Packet - THE solution

Subject: [CQ-Contest] Packet - THE solution
From: k5zd@charter.net (Randy Thompson, K5ZD)
Date: Thu Jun 5 02:19:18 2003
Yes, there are.  See winner of SOA category in SS CW 2001.

The way the categories are defined, it is not illegal, unethical, or
immoral.  However, it could be considered cowardly.

Randy, K5ZD

> -----Original Message-----
> From: cq-contest-bounces@contesting.com
> [mailto:cq-contest-bounces@contesting.com]On Behalf Of wo4o@juno.com
> Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 19:01 PM
> To: CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Packet - THE solution
>
>
> Are there SO (non distracted by Packet Spots) that actually submit as
> SO(A) to place high or win the SO(A) category?
>
> Would that be considered illegal, unethical and/or immoral?
>
> And, are there ops that make use of ONE Packet Spot to (minimize
> distraction and) legitimately submit  SO(A) to place high or win the
> SO(A) category?
>
> Just curious . . .
>
> 73 Ric Wo4o
>
> ...-.-
>
>
> ________________________________________________________________
> The best thing to hit the internet in years - Juno SpeedBand!
> Surf the web up to FIVE TIMES FASTER!
> Only $14.95/ month - visit www.juno.com to sign up today!
> ---------------------------------------------------------------
>     The world's top contesters battle it out in Finland!
> THE OFFICIAL FILM of WRTC 2002 now on professional DVD and VHS!
>        http://home1.pacific.net.sg/~jamesb/
> ---------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>