Subject: | [CQ-Contest] self spotting vs other cheating |
---|---|
From: | KI9A@aol.com (KI9A@aol.com) |
Date: | Wed May 28 17:34:06 2003 |
In a message dated 5/28/03 1:23:40 AM Central Daylight Time, spederson@yahoo.com writes: > There's only one solution to verifying the identity of the sender - > > We could use the same process that the ARRL implemented within their LOTW - > that of Public / Private key encryption. > Nice idea, but there is an awful lot of non-contesters using packet, ect... |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | [CQ-Contest] self spotting vs other cheating, ve4xt@mb.sympatico.ca |
---|---|
Next by Date: | [CQ-Contest] self spotting WPXCW, Hudanik Antal |
Previous by Thread: | [CQ-Contest] self spotting vs other cheating, ve4xt@mb.sympatico.ca |
Next by Thread: | [CQ-Contest] self spotting vs other cheating, k2qmf@juno.com |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |