| Subject: | [CQ-Contest] Poor QualitySignals | 
|---|---|
| From: | Cqtestk4xs@aol.com (Cqtestk4xs@aol.com) | 
| Date: | Wed Dec 11 23:17:16 2002 | 
In a message dated 12/12/02 3:41:20 AM Greenwich Standard Time, k5iid@ntelos.net writes: << The guys that win no doubt have big, good hardware. >> That is not necessarily so. I can think of bunches of stations who have average setups and do great. I can also think of some big stations who have perpetually underachieving results. A small station does not mean a small score, nor does a big station mean a high score. Bill K4XS...a big, good hardware station(when it all works)  | 
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> | 
|---|---|---|
  | ||
| Previous by Date: | [CQ-Contest] Poor QualitySignals, Ron Wetjen | 
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [CQ-Contest] A Dear Elmer - WA9TPQ - SK, K9YO-Cedrick Johnson | 
| Previous by Thread: | [CQ-Contest] Re: NWT, Dave | 
| Next by Thread: | [CQ-Contest] Poor QualitySignals, K7LXC@aol.com | 
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |