CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

[CQ-Contest] NWT

Subject: [CQ-Contest] NWT
From: k1ep@arrl.net (Ed Parish K1EP)
Date: Wed Dec 11 11:08:01 2002
At 08:17 AM 12/11/02 -0500, Pete Smith wrote:
>At 01:23 PM 12/10/02 -0800, Tree wrote:
>>Allowing it to be called anything else will result in confusion.  The
>>robot is doing its job by alerting you to the problem in real time
>>so that you can fix it with a quick edit to your file.  I realize
>>that some might not like the NWT designation - but I would suggest
>>they need to take this up with whomever made up that list on the
>>ARRL web site - not the robot author.
>
>
>Tree also doesn't mention it, but it is trivial for the logging software to 
>accept virtually anything people send and enter the correct abbreviation in 
>the log.  TR Log already does that, and I'm astounded if the other major 
>programs don't.

Actually, here is the line from the SEC.DAT file in CT.  The first entry is the 
"official" abbreviation, and the subsequent entries are acceptable entries.

YT:         YT,YU,NW,VE8,VY1; VE

Funny, NWT is not an accepted abbreviation, I guess I will have to add it...




<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>