Subject: | [CQ-Contest] Arbitrary rules - interpreted as discrimination |
---|---|
From: | k4ww@arrl.net (Shelby Summerville) |
Date: | Thu Sep 26 22:01:53 2002 |
<david.e.burger@au.pwcglobal.com> wrote: "The peculiar thing I noted when I was batting in the smaller contests last year, was the ONLY QSOparty in the USA to restrict international ham participation is the NAQP" Obviously you haven't operated NAQP RTTY! Not only are DX stations welcome, they are elgible for awards! DX is not allowed to work DX, nor are they counted as multipliers, but they count for QSO points! Approximently 30 DX stations submitted logs for July NAQP RTTY. Try it, you might like it! C'Ya, Shelby - K4WW |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | [CQ-Contest] Chinese Prefix List needed..., Tim Makins, EI8IC |
---|---|
Next by Date: | [CQ-Contest] Arbitrary rules - interpreted as discrimination, Cqtestk4xs@aol.com |
Previous by Thread: | [CQ-Contest] Arbitrary rules - interpreted as discrimination, david.e.burger@au.pwcglobal.com |
Next by Thread: | [CQ-Contest] 2002 ARRL DX CW Results, Marcelo |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |