Dennis;
For DOS: You could have a look at SD @ http://www.ei5di.com
It does not offer the needed pipes and whistles for mulitistation /
multioperator efforts, but for a single operator it is so
straightforward and intuitive and at the same time offering everything
you will need.
73
Chris / LA8OM
--- Dennis Ponsness <wb0wao@hotmail.com> skrev: > Thanks all for the
info on the most "popular" 'tests. And TNX to
> Igor,
> UA9CDC, for the info on the RDXC 'test. Had a great time and will do
> it
> again next year!!
>
> Now my NEXT question is about logging software...
>
> I take it there are 3 "main" ones - CT, NA, and TR. I am running a
> 486
> 166MHz 'puter with either DOS or Windows For Workgroups 3.11 - nope,
> no
> WIN 9x - and seriously doubt that I will be using rig to 'puter or
> rotor
> control interfaces. I will probably use the CW interface when my CW
> gets up to "contest speed". There is no packet cluster up here in
> this
> area of Michigan - "Up North" - as of yet, but who knows someday
> there
> may be? I have a couple of these 'puters, and may want to network
> them
> together as the YL wants to operate in contests as well when she
> upgrades as a multi/multi or multi/2R. Also, no CD-ROM drive on the
> 'puters either.
>
> So, taking all of the above into account, what would be the group's
> suggestion on the "best" one of the 3 for me to use? I am kinda
> leaning
> to NA as it seems to be the most "inexpensive" and has the capability
> to
> allow me to create templates for contests.
>
> See you all in CQWPX! Have to work the night of the 31st, but should
> get in a decent amount of time in the beginning of the 'test.
>
> 73
>
> Dennis - WB0WAO
>
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
______________________________________________________
Sjekk snørapporter...
fra 500 ski-destinasjoner i Europa
på http://no.snow.yahoo.com/
|