| Subject: | [CQ-Contest] Super-duper-pooper check database function of TR, etc. | 
|---|---|
| From: | n6tr@teleport.com (n6tr@teleport.com) | 
| Date: | Fri May 7 09:47:03 1999 | 
> So now we need to do a survey and see if those people using TR > with an exchange database did better than those without. My experience with this feature is that there are two problems with it: 1. The data changes more from year to year than you error rate. 2. It distracts you too much from listening to what is being sent. For me, I think I have a LOWER error rate without it. 73 Tree N6TR "We don't use the weapons - we just build them". -- CQ-Contest on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/_cq-contest/ Administrative requests: cq-contest-REQUEST@contesting.com  | 
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> | 
|---|---|---|
  | ||
| Previous by Date: | [CQ-Contest] Super-duper-pooper check database function of TR, etc., tgstewart@pepco.com | 
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [CQ-Contest] Guessing or miscopied?, v31jp@logical123.net | 
| Previous by Thread: | [CQ-Contest] Super-duper-pooper check database function of TR, etc., tgstewart@pepco.com | 
| Next by Thread: | [CQ-Contest] Super-duper-pooper check database function of TR, etc., Scott Ellington | 
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |