KØHB writes:
> Kenneth E. Harker wrote:
> 
> > Participation and interest in the sprints is at an all-time low,
> > and without heavy-duty sponsorship, the contests are destined to 
> > die out.
> 
> Contests succeed because they are fun, not because of their 
> 'sponsorship'.  If quality of 'sponsorship' determined longevity,
> then most of the CQ-sponsored events would have been stillborn.
> 
I would consider CQ to be heavy-duty sponsorship.
-- 
George Fremin III                 
Johnson City, Texas             "Experiment trumps theory." 
K5TR (ex.WB5VZL)                            -- Dave Leeson W6NL
geoiii@kkn.net                             
830-868-2510                      
http://www.kkn.net/~k5tr                   
--
CQ-Contest on WWW:        http://www.contesting.com/_cq-contest/
Administrative requests:  cq-contest-REQUEST@contesting.com
 
 |