I agree with Bill with the exception of the 150'+ height.
At W1BK, we run a remote tuned (Heathkit remote tuner)
inverted V at 110' and have heard more than once from
"big guns" running 4 squares that we were "beating them
into the pile-ups" into Europe, Africa and Pacific.
Mike, W1NR
Bill Fisher - W4AN wrote:
>
> > That, combined with the lower radiation
> > angle, should make the 4-square quite superior to a high dipole. Most
> > 4-square owners I've talked to think so.
>
> Well I'm a 4-square owner and I am going to disagree with you to a
> point. This winter I did some comparisons with N4RJ on 80M CW. Val is
> running a inverted-V extended length dipole with the ends pulled slightly
> toward Europe at a height of 165 feet. I'm not sure of the exact length
> of the dipole. Every station that we compared with that night gave Val
> one S-unit advantage over my 4-square. Every station we worked was in
> Europe and Val and I were both running the same power output.
>
> However, I seemed to be hearing better than Val (he was using a
> beverage), and I believe I am far superior in all other directions
> especially to Asia.
>
> I think a high dipole (150' + ) on 80M is a VERY good transmit antenna in
> it's favored directions. Combined with some phased beverages for RX, I
> believe this is better combination than a 4-square to those directions.
> However, the 4-square is very versatile.
>
> 73
>
> Bill, W4AN
>
> --
> CQ-Contest on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/_cq-contest/
> Administrative requests: cq-contest-REQUEST@contesting.com
--
**************** Give Every Man His Dew **************
Michael A. McCarthy, President
Everest Engineering Corporation, Consultants
4 Barnes Circle, Marlborough, MA 01752
(508) 460-6737, FAX (508) 460-7951
mailto:w1nr@eecorp.com
******************************************************
--
CQ-Contest on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/_cq-contest/
Administrative requests: cq-contest-REQUEST@contesting.com
|