Subject: | [CQ-Contest] T1MC vs TM1C (ethics?) |
---|---|
From: | abrogdon@arrl.org (Brogdon, Al, W1AB) |
Date: | Fri Mar 7 09:21:00 1997 |
>From: martin38945 >To: cq-contest >Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] T1MC vs TM1C (ethics?) > >"How come CT doesn't recognize T1?" _______________ Herr Martin, We in CT have recognized T1 since the Treaty of 1810.5. "Und why?" you might ask. Simple--to get the added multiplier, even if the note IS very bad. Al, 599 CT -- CQ-Contest on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/_cq-contest/ Administrative requests: cq-contest-REQUEST@contesting.com |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | [CQ-Contest] CT Master.DTA, Dan Weisenburger |
---|---|
Next by Date: | [CQ-Contest] Update's QSL Routes CQWW 1996, Pascual.Guardiola@inte.haci.carm.es |
Previous by Thread: | [CQ-Contest] T1MC vs TM1C (ethics?), Randy Thompson |
Next by Thread: | [CQ-Contest] Fwd: Novice/Tech in DX contests, Dan Robbins |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |