The old address of merchant@crl.com doesn't seem to work anymore? Can
someone give me his new address for E-log submission?
Thanks mike k5nz
please send to me direct.
>From kn6dv@qnet.com (Will, KN6DV) Mon Jan 27 14:23:14 1997
From: kn6dv@qnet.com (Will, KN6DV) (Will, KN6DV)
Subject: SCCC SPRINTers needed!
Message-ID: <199701271429.GAA14720@ns2.qnet.com>
Phone SPRINT is Feb. 1st and CW SPRINT is Feb 8th.
Please send me a note if you would like to be on a team.
Thanks 73 Will, KN6DV
Vice President SCCC
kn6dv@contesting.com
http://www.av.qnet.com/~kn6dv
REFORM
Unless the reformer can invent something which substitutes attractive
virtues for attractive vices, he will fail.
(Walter Lippmann)
>From k4ma@mindspring.com (Jim Stevens) Mon Jan 27 14:53:22 1997
From: k4ma@mindspring.com (Jim Stevens) (Jim Stevens)
Subject: PVRC SPRINTers needed
Message-ID: <199701271451.JAA29046@mule1.mindspring.com>
Feb 2 at 0Z is Phone Sprint and Feb 9 at 0Z is
CW Sprint. Anyone interested in being on a
PVRC Sprint team, please e-mail me.
Thanks.
73, Jim Stevens, K4MA (ex KI4HN)
e-mail: k4ma@mindspring.com
www: http://www.mindspring.com/~k4ma
>From jjelect@fgi.net (Skip Riba) Mon Jan 27 15:22:52 1997
From: jjelect@fgi.net (Skip Riba) (Skip Riba)
Subject: question
Message-ID: <3.0.32.19970127092249.00690bf0@fgi.net>
hi does anyone have the address for the 3830 posting page thanks skip
ws9v thanks to all that worked me in the contest
>From floydjr@Interpath.com (Jimmy R. Floyd) Mon Jan 27 15:29:33 1997
From: floydjr@Interpath.com (Jimmy R. Floyd) (Jimmy R. Floyd)
Subject: CQ 160 CW 97 Scores I
Message-ID: <2.2.16.19970127152933.2d7ffc06@interpath.com>
1997 CQ 160 METER CW CONTEST
Raw Scores
Compiled by WA4ZXA
<floydjr@interpath.com)
Date Posted 01/27/97
CALL HRS SCORE Q'S PTS ST/VE DX
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SOP/QRP
K3WWP 8 6,300 117 252 25
KD1IA 7 1,768 74 168 73 1
SOP/HP
GM3YOR 20 742,176 988 6872 47 61
G0IVZ 22 508,434 812 5034 43 58
VE9AA 24 455,712 784 4512 54 47
LA9GX 10 166,026 458 2478 9 58
PA3DMH 9 67,536 222 1206 8 48
AA8U 254,600 815 2546 56 44
KM3T 22 243,360 702 2535 54 42
K3JT 14 123,570 459 55 35
N5UL 21 87,975 463 54 21
K2ONP 59,283 281 941 43 20
N5LZ 10 51,430 223 695 49 25
K7OX 11 32,648 238 583 45 11
SOP/LP
K2KQ 27 81,326 419 1099 49 25
AB1U 12 80,676 314 996 49 32
KJ9C 12 48,739 339 799 49 12
K9WIE 8 45,506 305 746 51 10
WO4O 9 21,887 237 509 40 3
WA7UQV 8,052 102 33
W0MU 705 22 15 0
MultiOP/HP
LY2ZZ (LY2BTA) 506,979 856 32 67
JH9VSF/9 438 16 3 3
W0CED 297,648 930 2862 57 47
N0NI 249,504 957 96
NQ4I 26 241,800 820 2418 57 43
AA4V 201,500 710 57 43
K9BG 18 175,400 560 57 40
AA3B 143,376 627 1648 55 32
K4OJ 139,026 501 94
MultiOP/LP
AB5SE 17 51,420 383 857 53 7
KK5GT 11 24,429 208 479 47 4
Multi Opertor List
K40J N0AX,WC4E,W1CW,W1YL
AA4V AA4V,N4SF
N0NI N0NI,N0AC,W0FLS
NQ4I NQ4I,K4BAI,K2UFT
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
NO ATTACHEMENTS !!!! I will not post attached scores.
Do not post any scores to the Contest Reflector, only to me direct or to
the 3830 reflector.
These are NOT OFFICIAL SCORES so do not send me logs or anything like a
log. I am on affilated with the CQ Mag or the contest committee.
Remember if I get any scores with only Single Op or no class on it I will
put you in Single Op High Power.
I realize there is not such class as MultiOP/LP. It is only for the guys
who want to see how they placed against each other.
73 Jim
**********************************************************
* Jimmy R. Floyd (Jim) Thomasville, NC *
* *
* Amateur Call: >> WA4ZXA << *
* Internet Address: >> floydjr@interpath.com << *
**********************************************************
>From floydjr@Interpath.com (Jimmy R. Floyd) Mon Jan 27 15:29:40 1997
From: floydjr@Interpath.com (Jimmy R. Floyd) (Jimmy R. Floyd)
Subject: NAQP SSB Jan 97 Scores IV
Message-ID: <2.2.16.19970127152940.26f76cfa@interpath.com>
NAQP SSB 97
CLAIMED SCORES
Compiled by: WA4ZXA
<floydjr@interpath.com)
Date Posted: 01/27/97
******* NEXT POSTING WILL BE FINAL POSTING *********
CALL SCORE QSOS MULTI
___________________________________________________________
Single/OP
K6LL 244,674 1242 197
N4ZZ 195,412 997 196
KW8N 188,513 853 221
AA8U 184,300 970 190
N9ITX/7 177,415 959 185
W6KY 168,165 909 185
K7UP (W5FX) 167,854 943 178
KE3Q 165,912 892 186
K4VUD 159,528 867 184
K3CR (KB3AFT) 149,776 814 184
K5OT 148,925 805 185
K5NZ 148,764 759 196
N4BP 144,000 1000 144
W8MJ 142,920 794 180
N5TU 141,069 797 177
K4NO 129,417 723 179
WA0ETC 119,641 661 181
K4MA (@AA4NC) 119,540 695 172
WC4E 119,479 733 163
WA1LNP 118,169 700 169
WA7BNM 115,370 695 166
KT4ZX 113,031 661 171
K0RC 112,752 696 162
K6BZ 108,281 779 139
W6EEN 107,954 701 154
WA4ZXA 107,200 670 160
W6TKF 107,074 682 157
K4RO 105,000 600 175
N6HC 105,300 675 154
AB5SE 104,625 675 155
K4RO 104,400 600 174
N7LOX 104,328 644 162
KN4T 98,049 667 147
K5BN 97,500 650 150
K4WW 90,750 550 165
W5ASP 87,000 580 150
K5DX 78,384 552 152
WT1O 77,250 512 150
K4CU (@KA9EKJ) 74,632 491 152
K9MY 69,350 475 146
K0EJ 68,101 451 151
K8BK 67,000 500 134
KK7A 66,429 549 121
K1VUT 66,308 484 137
WO4O 65,712 444 148
KK1L 65,540 452 145
K1SD 62,064 431 144
VE7CFD 55,998 549 102
WA3SES 55,470 430 129
KK5GT 53,055 405 131
K1NO 53,040 442 120
KO7X 48,251 427 113
K9WIE 44,409 339 131
KG8CW 44,149 371 119
WD9HTC 44,080 380 116
KA9FOX (@K9MA) 44,000 400 110
N0AXL 42,713 353 121
K4HQ/QRP 41,151 319 129
VE6IM 40,950 390 105
WB0OLA 39,528 324 122
N3IXR 38,100 300 127
NK4P 37,526 308 122
N9YXA 36,064 322 112
W7ZRC 33,988 293 116
KD3GC 33,858 342 99
N5WD 32,718 287 114
KE4RHU 30,528 318 96
KS4XG 29,900 260 115
N4OKX 28,000 280 100
KG5U 26,426 362 73
N5LZ 24,378 239 102
NJ8F 24,210 269 90
N5AV (KN5H) 22,246 227 98
WA8YRS 22,213 229 97
N4UL 21,900 219 104
N4CW 21,000 200 105
N7IN 20,839 229 91
K8MR 20,280 195 84
VE6DBH 19,197 243 79
AC8E 16,465 185 89
AE0M 15,276 201 76
K1TO/4 14,863 167 89
N9CO 14,364 171 84
KC4ZHQ 12,402 159 78
K1HT 12,213 177 69
K4AT 11,928 168 71
W9RM/M 11,340 140 81
K9PW 10,287 127 81
W4PA 9,558 141 68
KR4YL 9,054 135 67
KK5LO 8,710 130 67
N8TR 7,540 116 65
W9WI 5,800 100 58
K1ZO 5,445 99 55
K8RM 4,896 104 48
NY3C 3,285 73 45
W8AH 2,325 75 31
WA1CFS 1,560 65 24
AD1C 1,334 46 29
N9GG 378 27 14
Multi/OP
KS9K 453,348 1764 257
K5TR (@W5KFT) 404,435 1721 235
W4WA 333,450 1482 225
NK7U 327,140 1487 220
N0NI 289,492 1375 211
KF9YT 191,268 966 198
WB5M 57,856 512 113
N5KB 29,380 260 113
KB3A 18,837 207 91
Team Scores
TDXS Team #1 498,685
Kentucky CG Team L 190,104
Mad Rover Radio Club 50,506
Operator List
KB3A KB3A,KE3XS,KE3XZ,N3WAH
N0NI N0NI,N0AC,W0FLS
K5TR K5TR,N5KA
W4WA W4WA,N9HZQ,K0DI
KS9K WE9V,K9PG
NK7U NK7U,K7ZO,K7MK
KF9YT KF9YT,N9VVV
___________________________________________________________
NO ATTACHMENTS !!!!! ATTACHMENTS WILL NOT BE POSTED ON ANY SCORES
THAT I DO
73 Jim
**********************************************************
* Jimmy R. Floyd (Jim) Thomasville, NC *
* *
* Amateur Call: >> WA4ZXA << *
* Internet Address: >> floydjr@interpath.com << *
**********************************************************
>From Frank@grossmann.com (Frank Grossmann [DL1SBR]) Mon Jan 27 16:21:37 1997
From: Frank@grossmann.com (Frank Grossmann [DL1SBR]) (Frank Grossmann [DL1SBR])
Subject: 160m Test 599+location ??
Message-ID: <2.2.32.19970127162137.00b21fc0@apollo>
Due to uninformed operators the first 250 QSOs in our log were not logged
with the full location information.
Instead they "trusted" CT to automatically attach this information.
Actually CT only calculates the score + multipliers right but does not
attach the location exchange.
I now entered the missing data by hand. But: how should I know what
people exactly transmitted ?
About half the OK's sent "OK" while the other half transmitted "CZ".
HB9s gave us "CH", "HB" and "HB9"!
Pretty confusing, isn't it...
And this goes to K4JRB: Will I get any points deducted if the location
exchange was not entered correctly as transmitted ?
73!
Frank DL1SBR
(DK0SU in 160m test... anybody remember how our signals were in USA/VE ??)
--
Dipl.-Kaufm. Frank Grossmann frank@grossmann.com [DL1SBR]
Grossmann EDV-Beratung, Stuttgart http://www.grossmann.com
>From Edward.B.Luers@jpl.nasa.gov (Edward B Luers) Mon Jan 27 18:02:37 1997
From: Edward.B.Luers@jpl.nasa.gov (Edward B Luers) (Edward B Luers)
Subject: No subject
Message-ID:
<00C7F32ECEDBD09C*/c=us/admd=telemail/prmd=nasa/o=jpl/ou=ccmail/s=Luers/g=Edward/i=B/@MHS>
SIGNOFF
>From andriusi@siauliai.omnitel.net (Andrius Ignotas) Mon Jan 27 22:08:08 1997
From: andriusi@siauliai.omnitel.net (Andrius Ignotas) (Andrius Ignotas)
Subject: Re 599+location
Message-ID: <199701272208.WAA12150@pikuolis.omnitel.net>
hello Frank,
The same problem. I did this correction after contest.
OK1xxx=599OK1
HB9xxx=599HB9
K5xxx =599OK
in contest rules must be marked that number to send consist
of RS(T)+country main prefix (sample:OK1 SM1 DL1 LY1 etc)
73!ANDY LY2BTA&LY2ZZ
>From sales@tentec.com (Ten-Tec Inc.) Mon Jan 27 15:44:07 1997
From: sales@tentec.com (Ten-Tec Inc.) (Ten-Tec Inc.)
Subject: Lost in the shuffle??
Message-ID: <19970127154407.9e7ad8b3.in@mvangel.com>
Overlooked in all the yelling about Alaskan and Hawaiian
vanity club calls was this tidbit:
KG7FU writes:
>>=20
>> The use of a friends address, condo, hotel or whatever is not more=20
>> ethical to me that a mult transmitter calling CQ - both are not the=20
>> intentions of what was presented but an abuse of the system.=20
>What's unethical about a mult? The operations I have been a part
>of have allowed me to operate when the club station would have
>otherwise been busy if it were a single op. I guess Field Day is
>unethical.
I'm...slowly...cranking my mechanical can opener to get these worms
out...here comes:
It's not a multi operator effort that was being referred to.
The way the rules are written for a few contests (CQ WW comes to mind),
you may use a second transmitter in a multi-single effort to hunt
multipliers with, provided both transmitters are not on the air at
the same time. This is perfectly legit.
Unfortunately, some folks call CQ on this second transmitter,
and then log any non-multiplier contacts made as zero points while
doing so. It is definitely outside the intention of the rules, but
by reading the rules to the letter it is permissible. It is claimed
that this *can* be strategically advantageous.
Whether or not it is "ethical" is an entirely different matter.
Cheers,
Scott Robbins, W4PA
|