Hello All....
Less than 30 days till we can stop this vanity crap and get back to trashing
the nets!
( I know...we have to bite our tongues lest our less experienced brethern
lose interest....But I know and you KNOW I know...and I know you know I
know.....)
Now...quoting the FRC Charter under section C.1a : to wit....No single op is
permitted ANY sleep. The contest is 48 hours....not 34! Transgressions are
dealt with severely and swiftly. Violators are sentenced to work the 160
Phone contest from the "Black Hole" of WN3K's palatial estate.. Believe
me..there are few violators.
I hope you ALL get the calls you so EAGERLY desire...I'm still debating which
call to pick in gate 3.....but you'll have to work me to find out what it
is....
If you need V2 on RS - 12 I'll be QRV Monday after the TEST...Should have 5-6
passes. QSL V26DX to the manager KK3S....Tyler,KF3P/V26TS will have RTTY up
and running, too....QSL his home call
73 es good propagation!
de Doug // N3ADL // V26DX
Team Antigua V26B
Team Antigua Website: http://www.frc-contest.org/v26b
>From millersg@dmapub.dma.org (Steve Miller) Thu Sep 26 03:26:41 1996
From: millersg@dmapub.dma.org (Steve Miller) (Steve Miller)
Subject: 2 radio ops- headphone questions
Message-ID: <m0v669y-00028YC@dmapub.dma.org>
> One question is: If 1 rig is audible in each ear, do you have a serious
> handicap when one radio is turned down all the way? Does this present an
> 'inbalance' in your head? Is there a way to counteract this inbalance?
Place a variable resistor in shunt across the Left and Right audio lines.
I forget exactly what value I used, probably 500 ohms or so. The CW
position basically shorts L & R together so both radios are in both ears,
CCW is nearly "hard left and hard right". I prefer operating stereo with
a slight presence of each radio in the opposite ear. It seems less
fatiguing and I can concentrate a little easier. This arrangement also
alleviates the imbalance you refer to.
I have also operated at a station where a box does all the audio
switching (and tx/amp enable). Two radio operation has two modes which
I'll call dedicated stereo (radio 1 in left ear, radio 2 in right ear for
both tx & rx) and receiver only mode (radio 1 in left, radio 2 in right
while both are receiving, radio 2 in both ears when radio 1 is in tx and
vice versa). When I get tired, the "receiver only" mode seems to be more
disorienting for me than dedicated stereo but, some ops have the opposite
preference. Of course, the audio box can also select radio 1 only or
radio 2 only.
Make sure you practice, it will take some time and effort to learn this
technique and be able to use it to your best advantage. I am woefully
out of practice myself....
Hope this helps,
Steve
WD8IXE
>From slazar19@sgi.net (Spike Lazar) Thu Sep 26 04:25:42 1996
From: slazar19@sgi.net (Spike Lazar) (Spike Lazar)
Subject: Contest Reflector
Message-ID: <199609260325.XAA00155@orion.bv.sgi.net>
At 08:18 PM 9/25/96 -0400, you wrote:
>Yo Bafoof,
>
>I have finally signed onto the CQ-CONTEST-REFLECTOR and I'm not sure
>its the right one. All the postings that I have received since signing
>on have been Hams with big ego's and week signals worrying about what call
>sign they might get. It seems to me that if they need a new call sign
>to work dx or win the contest they probably need a face lift to get ****!
>(unless of course you are KZ2S in which case you need a stick to beat
>them off) Tell me am I on the right reflector?? There is less than a
>month before the biggest DX contest of the year and these Fish Head
>Gassers think a new call sign is going to give them the edge. They need a
>life!
>
> HOBO
Dear Hobo,
The reflector that your refering to was the original contest reflector
and was quite good for a long time. As in anything else, the word got
around and a lot of wannabees and newbees found links to the place and
what you now read is whats left.
About nine months ago, a sub-reflector which dove tails with the original
was set up and refeeds the inane subjects back to the inmates and in this
way we are able to keep these turkeys down on the farm where they belong,
while us real contesters discuss what is relevant on the sub-reflector.
Also to keep these people under sedation about 5% of the sub-reflector is
randomly rerouted back to the reflector which works like a zener supplying
just enough electrons to activate the contest related synapses in their
gourds. The only reason that this is done is so that we can keep the rate
up during contests and we couldn't do this without the necessary contest
fodder. Pretty smart huh!
Please do not repeat what I have told you because I don't want to ruin my
excellent reputation, so this message is for your eyes only!
Sincerely,
dr. Bafoofnik
p.s, I have subscribed you to the sub-reflector and now you can
join your peers!
>From foggie@dtx.net (foggie) Wed Sep 25 23:22:56 1996
From: foggie@dtx.net (foggie) (foggie)
Subject: Another way to make top ten
Message-ID: <XFMail.960925223106.foggie@dtx.net>
On 25-Sep-96 Tim_Coad@smtp.svl.trw.com wrote:
>>Another way to make top ten and sleep......
>
>Besides moving to the east coast you could:
>
>Just enter your Single Op unassisted score as Single-Op Assisted.
>
>OK, OK we dont want to start that thread again, but Im as tired of reading
>about vanity callsigns as I was about hearing OJ news, (And now the news media
>is trying to start that up again!) so I am anxious for some contest related
>material to be posted. So I'LL offer up some other contest topics for
>consideration:
>
>1. Do we need mandatory drug testing of contest ops?
yes. Why not, I have to do it anyways. (Uncle Sam insists)
>2. Are those East Coast big guns really running 3rd and 4th tier euros' or are
>they just reading calls from the callbook?
Probably reading. I can't even hear em in the mud most of the time.
>3. Does running QRO in contests really make you more likely to have female
>offspring?
Doubtful, female offspring probably related 1 above.
>4.a How many of you out there also have had hallucinations after 40 hours of
>no sleep? 4.b and what were they?
yes, winning obviously. :)
>5. What do you think about a new contest that is held ONLY on 14.230?
if its sstv ya want I'll have to dig out the old programs. gee the rate would be
real low dontch think? could we extend it to 14.230-14.236? :)
>6. Was the Russian woodpecker really a YCCC device to keep west coast hams
>from running JA's on 40?
yep, and it kept the midwest from runnning ANYTHING. :)
>
>OK well there, 6 topics I came up with in 6 minutes......any more?
>
you forgot some important ones:
7. Will a (bigger/higher/better) antennna really cure impotence?
8. If your antenna falls and noone is around will you be able to hear during
the next contest?
Al
>
>CU all in the next test!
>Tim - NU6S
------------------------------------------------------------
E-Mail: foggie <foggie@dtx.net>
Time: 22:23:00
-----------------------------------------------------------
Geek Code: GAT d H-- s:+ g+ p2 au+ a w+ v+ C++++ UL++++ P+
L++++ 3- E--- N++ K W--- M-- po Y+ t+ 5++ j R-
G' tv b++ D+ B--- e+ u+ h--- f r+++ n- z+++
-----------------------------------------------------------
This message was sent by XF-Mail, and is totally M$ Free
-----------------------------------------------------------
>From ni0e@sprynet.com (Mike Fatchett) Thu Sep 26 05:40:23 1996
From: ni0e@sprynet.com (Mike Fatchett) (Mike Fatchett)
Subject: Power and offspring
Message-ID: <01BBAB32.8C03E2C0@hd41-094.compuserve.com>
Hmmmm.......
I guess an Alpha 76PA is low power!
I have 2 boys. John 5 and Brenden 1 1/2. Then again when was the last time I
operated??????
Mike
NI0E for a few weeks more
----------
From: Larry Tyree[SMTP:tree@lady.axian.com]
Sent: Wednesday, September 25, 1996 1:54 PM
To: cq-contest@tgv.com
Subject: Power and offspring
> 3. Does running QRO in contests really make you more likely to have female
> offspring?
No way!!! I have never run illegal power in my life. And I have only
ever operated in Louisana once. And when I was at W7NI, I didn't inhale.
Tree N?TR
(father or Theresa, Rebecca and Sarah)
>From n5ia@juno.com (Milt Jensen) Thu Sep 26 06:35:53 1996
From: n5ia@juno.com (Milt Jensen) (Milt Jensen)
Subject: Calls issued
References: <199609250614.BAA03916@firefly.prairienet.org>
Message-ID: <19960926.044635.10286.25.N5IA@juno.com>
Zack,
I'm not intelligent enough to be able to post fake messages. The
previous messages were real and true, and this one is also. If you have
any questions or comments, you can call me at the telephone numbers
listed below. 73 de
---Milt Jensen @ ARS N5IA---
---Virden, NM Route Box 176---
---Duncan, AZ -- 85534---
---H: (505) 358-2105 W: (520) 359-2503---
---Reply to n5ia@juno.com---
On Wed, 25 Sep 1996 01:14:49 -0500 (CDT) w9sz@prairienet.org (Zack Widup)
writes:
>>Richard,
>> The club callsigns are all issued to me as the trustee. We
>have
>>an area wide organization (three states), and we have to deal with
>the
>>Forest Service and the Bureau of Land Management for our site
>permits.
>> It has been our experience over the last 20 years that it is
>>difficult to get all the paperwork changed when a member moves or
>passes
>>away.
>> Our decision was to have all the club stations licensed to
>one
>>trustee (in this case me) so that when I die or should happen to go
>away,
>>the only change that has to be made is with the FCC for the single
>>trustee change.
>> Thanks for your interest and inquiry.
>>
>> 73 de
>>
>>---Milt Jensen @ ARS N5IA---
>>---Virden, NM Route Box 176---
>>---Duncan, AZ -- 85534---
>>---H: (505) 358-2105 W: (520) 359-2503---
>>---Reply to n5ia@juno.com---
>>
>>
>
>Whoever is posting all these fake messages from juno.com, I hope you
>get
>sufficient jollies to knock it off.
>
>Trey, maybe you should have an authentication checker on the server,
>as
>Lyndon does on the DX server. I believe the DX server can only be
>posted
>to by someone who has subscribed to it.
>
>Hopefully the rest of us get to recognize the fake poster and just
>ignore
>him.
>
>Now back to CONTESTING!
>
>73, Zack, W9SZ for 19 years and hopefully for many more
>From aa4lr@radio.org (Bill Coleman) Thu Sep 26 14:30:46 1996
From: aa4lr@radio.org (Bill Coleman) (Bill Coleman)
Subject: Contest topics (was: sleep)
Message-ID: <960826092806.JAA14115@gate.iterated.com>
>From: Tim Coad, Tim_Coad@smtp.svl.trw.com
>
>So I'LL offer up some other contest topics for consideration:
>
>1. Do we need mandatory drug testing of contest ops?
Maybe we need manditory drugging of contest ops....
>2. Are those East Coast big guns really running 3rd and 4th tier euros' or
>are they just reading calls from the callbook?
Naw, they have a random call generator built into CT. It checks to make
sure the call isn't listed in MASTER.DTA
>3. Does running QRO in contests really make you more likely to have female
>offspring?
Well, I've NEVER owned an amplifier, and am the proud father of two
girls, so there goes that theory....
>4.a How many of you out there also have had hallucinations after 40 hours of
>no sleep? 4.b and what were they?
a. Yes
b. People holding meaningful conversations about contesting on
CQ-Contest. <grin>
>5. What do you think about a new contest that is held ONLY on 14.230?
Didn't you hear? NCJ has added the North American SSTV Sprint. First run
is going to be held next year in April.
>6. Was the Russian woodpecker really a YCCC device to keep west coast hams
>from running JA's on 40?
No, the woodpecker was actually created by the NCCC. It was designed to
take out the front ends of all the YCCC contest stations with antennas
pointed toward Europe.
<grin>
Bill Coleman, AA4LR Mail: aa4lr@radio.org
Quote: "Not in a thousand years will man ever fly!"
-- Wilbur Wright, 1901
|