Randy, 'ZD, was talking about his tilted vertical for 160 last week...I have
just changed computers and software for e-mail and cannot open that piece
again...if you have it in your archieves please send a copy of Randy's piece
to:
bk1zx70sfl@aol.com
>From Gary Schwartz <garyk9gs@solaria.sol.net> Sun Jan 28 05:26:21 1996
From: Gary Schwartz <garyk9gs@solaria.sol.net> (Gary Schwartz)
Subject: "Goodies" for Sale, Low Prices!
Message-ID: <Pine.3.02.9601272319.C5098-a100000@solaria.sol.net>
On Sat, 27 Jan 1996, Jim Reid wrote:
> Where on the net do I list some stuff I ought to sell?
> Logikey keyer, KAMplus and sftwr , all my
> Packet stuff, inc.DR-1200T plus a Ten-Tec 253
> auto ant tuner, etc, etc, etc. I know not here,
> but where?
>
The best place is the Usenet group: rec.radio.amateur.swap
73,
Gary K9GS (You have to STOP the Q-Tip when there's resistance !)
________________________________________________________________
| |
| Gary Schwartz K9GS E-Mail: garyk9gs@solaria.sol.net |
| Society of Midwest Contesters Packet:K9GS@WA9KEC.WI.USA.NOAM |
| Greater Milwaukee DX Association Secretary/Treasurer |
|________________________________________________________________|
>From w7ni@teleport.com (Stan Griffiths) Sun Jan 28 11:58:47 1996
From: w7ni@teleport.com (Stan Griffiths) (Stan Griffiths)
Subject: DXCC
Message-ID: <199601281158.DAA12824@desiree.teleport.com>
Why not have a team
>>>of three ARRL people -- dx'ers, not board members -- be responsible for
>>>"judging" whether an expedition has "acceptable" permission -- Majority
rules.
I have two questions:
1) Is this the right place for a DXCC discussion?
2) What makes a board member an undesirable or incorrect person to judge
the acceptability of a dxpedition?
>> It seems clear to me that the ARRL no longer wishes to be part of
>>DXing and contesting. The entire program has become a costly and
>>unprofitable albatross to them. Their discontent is clearly reflected in
>>the form of increased fees for submissions and low profile DX columns and
>>articles.
EVERYTHING costs more than it used to. Naturally, the fees should reflect this.
>>It may well be their intent to instill controversy over the
>>acceptance of rare DX operations in the hope that someone else will relieve
>>them of the burden which they themselves have created.
>>
>>
>> Bill Thomas KC9AL
I really have a tough time accepting this theory. I know a few board
members and I just don't believe it.
Stan W7NI@teleport.com
>From force12e@lightlink.com (Natan) Sun Jan 28 14:27:22 1996
From: force12e@lightlink.com (Natan) (Natan)
Subject: Yaesu FT-1000MP inquiry
Message-ID: <199601281429.JAA00250@light.lightlink.com>
Thanks to all who responded with comments and opinions about
using the 1000MP as a contest radio. Collected my first
JA1MP QSL card and used the radio during the 160 contest.
Had no overload/IMD problems and all that was at the
headphones was supposed to be there.
These opinions are my own and my province only!
Opinions expressed are not those of FORCE 12, but
are mine totally!!
Natan W6XR/2
|