Hi Contesters,
I rcvd above ROM after a long, long time but no software i0Jvvnstructions
attached. Can anyone tell me how to use it in order to get VFO freqs to PC?
73 de Mario, S56A, S57MM, N1YU, ex YU3EA, YU1PCF.
email: Marijan.Miletic@IJS.SI
>From Trey Garlough <GARLOUGH@TGV.COM> Fri May 6 15:47:58 1994
From: Trey Garlough <GARLOUGH@TGV.COM> (Trey Garlough)
Subject: Repeating Messages
Message-ID: <768235678.592527.GARLOUGH@TGV.COM>
> I think it is wonderful that some folks repeat entire
> big long messages and then say at the end that they
> agree with these big long messages.
> That way, these big long messages, which everyone
> has read before, will never die.
> It never occurred to me that anyone would care if
> I agreed with some of these big long messages which
> are often repeated on this forum. I usually don't
> save too many of these but I will research this and
> maybe repeat some of these big long messages and
> then say at the end, in one line, that I agree
> with them. Will that be ok?
>
> Lets have a little common sense.
>
> Ciaio N2AA
I agree 100% with N2AA.
--Trey, WN4KKN/6
>From clay torsten <rtclay@uxa.cso.uiuc.edu> Fri May 6 19:40:02 1994
From: clay torsten <rtclay@uxa.cso.uiuc.edu> (clay torsten)
Subject: Wire Beams (fwd)
Message-ID: <Pine.3.05.9405061301.A6136-a100000@uxa.cso.uiuc.edu>
One big advantage of a vee beam (I mean long-wire vee) over a wire Yagi is that
you can use it on more than one band...a vee beam with the apex angle optimized
for say 14 Mhz will still have usable gain on 40, 15 and probably also
10m.
R. Torsten Clay, N4OGW/9 n4ogw@uiuc.edu
> I've used a couple of different types with great success when I lived in
> 6 land. I used a 3 element wire beam in an inverted V configuration for
> several years
>
> Then I tried a Vee beam, each side about 2 wavelenghts long shaped in a V
> with the open side towards the east coast. That worked even better than
> the 3 element vee beam.
>
>
> Have fun and good luck.
>
> 73 NV6Z rdrueter@hebron.connected.com
>
>
>
>From Doug Grant <0006008716@mcimail.com> Sat May 7 02:30:00 1994
From: Doug Grant <0006008716@mcimail.com> (Doug Grant)
Subject: Fwd: Re: Repeating Messages
Message-ID: <01940507013010/0006008716NA3EM@mcimail.com>
-----------------
Forwarded Message
Date: Fri May 6 14:23:41 1994
From: Trey Garlough
EMS: INTERNET / MCI ID: 376-5414
MBX: GARLOUGH@tgv.com
TO: Tom Frenaye / MCI ID: 234-9723
TO: Adam S. Kerner / MCI ID: 414-6960
TO: D. Leeson / MCI ID: 554-3629
TO: Robert J Halprin / MCI ID: 558-2789
TO: Danny Eskenazi / MCI ID: 572-0561
TO: Jeff Bolda / MCI ID: 578-2837
TO: James Brooks / MCI ID: 585-1359
TO: * Doug Grant / MCI ID: 600-8716
TO: Brian Bogh / MCI ID: 612-5879
TO: Thomas J. Wall / MCI ID: 613-0613
TO: Rus Healy / MCI ID: 614-7675
TO: Charles Fulp Jr / MCI ID: 631-3915
TO: George Cutsogeorge / MCI ID: 635-4141
TO: David R. Siddall / MCI ID: 635-8668
TO: Mike Wetzel W9RE / MCI ID: 636-7589
TO: Paolo Cortese / MCI ID: 638-4393
TO: Art Charette / MCI ID: 640-6286
TO: Jim Duffy / MCI ID: 641-7176
TO: David O. Hachadorian / MCI ID: 647-1356
TO: Sig / MCI ID: 648-1603
TO: Kenneth G. Kopp / MCI ID: 648-5696
TO: Douglas S. Zwiebel / MCI ID: 648-9207
TO: James White / MCI ID: 649-2564
TO: Wayne Mills / MCI ID: 650-9309
TO: William L. Snider / MCI ID: 657-3551
TO: Lewis Tompkins / MCI ID: 660-4501
TO: Felipe J. Hernandez / MCI ID: 662-7542
TO: K9VV - Fred Kleber / MCI ID: 663-6049
TO: Richard Hallman / MCI ID: 613-5537
TO: Eugene Walsh / MCI ID: 450-4465
CC: cq-contest
EMS: INTERNET / MCI ID: 376-5414
MBX: cq-contest@tgv.com
Subject: Re: Repeating Messages
Message-Id: <31940506150813/0003765414NA5EM>
Source-Msg-Id: <768235678.592527.GARLOUGH@TGV.COM>
> I think it is wonderful that some folks repeat entire
> big long messages and then say at the end that they
> agree with these big long messages.
> That way, these big long messages, which everyone
> has read before, will never die.
> It never occurred to me that anyone would care if
> I agreed with some of these big long messages which
> are often repeated on this forum. I usually don't
> save too many of these but I will research this and
> maybe repeat some of these big long messages and
> then say at the end, in one line, that I agree
> with them. Will that be ok?
>
> Lets have a little common sense.
>
> Ciaio N2AA
I agree 100% with N2AA.
--Trey, WN4KKN/6
----------------------
I agree, too. It's even better if it came through MCI Mail, and you get to
see which other subscribers to the reflector use MCI Mail. Over 900 bytes
before you get to the text...
-- Doug K1DG
>From barry@w2up.wells.com (Barry Kutner) Fri May 6 23:26:14 1994
From: barry@w2up.wells.com (Barry Kutner) (Barry Kutner)
Subject: TH-7 and 40-2CD progress report
Message-ID: <FqaXLc1w165w@w2up.wells.com>
price@nosc.mil (James N. Price) (by way of price@cod.nosc.mil) writes:
> the 40-2CD goes on top still, but with the support brace inverted
> (Vee shape underneath) to get it to the top of the mast,
>
> the TH-7 mounts 90 degrees to the 40-2CD, as far away from it as
> possible,
>
> 73--Jim, K6ZH, price@nosc.mil
>
>
>
Just a few comments...
If you invert the 40-2CD support brace, it MAY not provide adequate
support. When on top, all you deal with is tension. When on bottom, you
have to consider buckling. Does anyone know if it will work that way as
supplied by cushcraft? I'd be interested in a true engineering-type
analysis, not just some anecdotal stories of how well it works.
I have my 40-2CD about 8-9 feet above my TH7 (parallel elements). 20
meters has been fine. I havn't been thrilled with 10 and 15 though. Has
anyone else had a similar good experience mounting the 2 antennas 90
degrees from each other?
73 Barry
Barry N. Kutner, W2UP Usenet/Internet: barry@w2up.wells.com
Newtown, PA Packet Radio: W2UP @ WB3JOE.#EPA.PA.USA.NA
Packet Cluster: W2UP >K2TW (FRC)
.......................................................................
|