CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

No subject

Subject: No subject
From: bmichaud@vnet.IBM.COM (bmichaud@vnet.IBM.COM)
Date: Mon Jan 17 08:38:41 1994
                                 NCJ NA QSO PARTY
     Exchanged Information: W1IHN BERT NC
     Hours of Operation: 07:56
     band      QSOs     points    mults
     
     160          8         8        8
      80         31        31       19
      40        205       205       42
      20         54        54       32
      15         41        41       20
      10         13        13        7
     
     TOTAL      352       352      128      SCORE: 45,056
     Club or Team Name: BLUE MOON
     Comments: After two minutes on 75 fone I remembered why I
     prefer CW...it was like a haven for all the weirdos!!!
     Impressive operation by WB5VZL...
     See y'all in the 160.
     Bert, W1IHN

>From Jim Stevens" <ki4hn@vnet.IBM.COM  Mon Jan 17 13:53:43 1994
From: Jim Stevens" <ki4hn@vnet.IBM.COM (Jim Stevens)
Subject: NAQP Results

Call: KI4HN

B     Q     M
80   156   41
40    95   31
20    69   33
15    40   19
10    10    8
     370  132  = 48,840

Didn't do a good enough job of moving multipliers.  Agree with Bob, ND1H,
that 10 is a black hole.  How do those left coasters make so many Q's on 10?

73, Jim in NC

>From Jay Kesterson K0GU x6826 <jayk@hpxxx.fc.hp.com>  Mon Jan 17 14:36:31 1994
From: Jay Kesterson K0GU x6826 <jayk@hpxxx.fc.hp.com> (Jay Kesterson K0GU x6826)
Subject: K0GU NAQP SSB
Message-ID: <9401171436.AA06793@hpxxx.fc.hp.com>

UTC   160   80   40   20   15   10  rate total        K0GU  Jay  CO
----------------------------------------------         
18Z     0    0    0    0   49   60   109   109        Team Internet
19Z     0    0    0    0  138    0   138   247
20Z     0    0    0    1   16   54    71   318
21Z     0    0    0    0   77   22    99   417
22Z     0    0    0   13   81    1    95   512
23Z     0    0    0  158   14    0   172   684
00Z     0    0   28   76    0    0   104   788
01Z     0    0    0    0    0    0     0   788    :60 OFF
02Z     0    0   97    0    0    0    97   885
03Z     0   81    0    0    0    0    81   966    :30 OFF
04Z    26   29    0    0    0    0    55  1021    :05 OFF
05Z    20    0    0    0    0    0    20  1041    :25 OFF
----------------------------------------------
tot    46  110  125  248  375  137        1041
mults  25   38   36   46   46   38         229    238,389

FT-1000D, Mosley PRO-96 @ 57', Cushcraft A3 @ 30', Inverted L 80/160

- Rewired the control box of my Ameritron remote coax switch so that
  when its turned to the ground position it turns on both antenna #1
  and #2. Cheap and easy way to spray with the two yagis.

- 40 died very early. Poor choice to take a hour break at 01Z.

- 10 was good enough that I had to CQ to flush out the mults but the
  rate wasn't good.

- 160 is turning into a good band in this contest. Really tough trying to
  find a frequency with good ole boys chewin' the rag from 1840 to 1900.

73, Jay K0GU                   jayk@fc.hp.com

>From alan@dsd.es.com (Alan Brubaker)  Mon Jan 17 14:47:34 1994
From: alan@dsd.es.com (Alan Brubaker) (Alan Brubaker)
Subject: NAQP Results
Message-ID: <9401171447.AA11665@dsd.ES.COM>

K6XO/7  Single Op.

Band     QSOs    Mult.

20       113      36
15        22      16
10         5       5

Total    140      57   =   7,980

Time:   1 hour 55 min.

Team Internet

Wish I had had more time, but I didn't. I will be QRV in the
CQ 160 CW contest this weekend.

Alan, K6XO

>From Tony Brock-Fisher <fisher@hp-and.an.hp.com>  Mon Jan 17 16:48:50 1994
From: Tony Brock-Fisher <fisher@hp-and.an.hp.com> (Tony Brock-Fisher)
Subject: Rig Survey
Message-ID: <9401171648.AA06825@hp-and.an.hp.com>

Here's a quick survey question on rigs - Which would you prefer for
serious single-op multi radio contesting - a single FT1000 or a
pair of IC-765's ? (and why).   -Tony, K1KP

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>