When I decide to enter a contest effort, its to be a competitor! Doesn't
matter whether I have a chance to win or not. Its attitude and spirit. My
final score and listing will tell you whether I had a big station or a modest
station.
There are lots of reasons to compete -- maybe its to improve from last year's
effort, or a friendly rivalry with a fellow contestor.
If I just a participant, then why enter the contest. If I don't enter the
contest, then where are the 'competitors' going to work to get a contact?
Scott nd0p
SGaulding@aol.com
>From CT1BOH <0006309523@mcimail.com> Tue Jan 25 21:52:00 1994
From: CT1BOH <0006309523@mcimail.com> (CT1BOH)
Subject: NCJ EDITORIAL
Message-ID: <10940125215201/0006309523PK3EM@mcimail.com>
B00000000000000
B0100000027fed4
>From CT1BOH <0006309523@mcimail.com> Tue Jan 25 22:10:00 1994
From: CT1BOH <0006309523@mcimail.com> (CT1BOH)
Subject: NCJ EDITORIAL
Message-ID: <90940125221009/0006309523PK1EM@mcimail.com>
Being new to Internet Im really impressed by the level
of debate going on.
As most of you know I take contesting very seriously
in terms of devotion time and money spent.
I don't agree with the distinction between competitor
and participant.
Contesting is very similar to Formula one racing.
One cannot expect a low profile team to win the
championship. You need both a good motor and a
good pilot.
Every participant is a competitor. Some enjoy several
advantages. Either Geographical, mechanical or of
skill.
Advantages should be reduced. How? Not by creating
new categories to have new winners or regional
divisions for the same purpose but stimulate, as
someone said activity. East Coasters enjoy a great
advantage because of the multiple European
multipliers\runs. The west coasters don't. So the
culprit is to create activity in the pacific/asia area in
order to reduce their disadvantage. Yes... I know, this
will take some time. But just imagine 0.00001% of
the Chinese population as contesters. Most of this
discussion would die.
What contesters really need is better write-ups.
Why do you contest? There are so many reasons...
What do you expect? Recognition of your
achievement.
Are you getting the write-ups you want? Certainly
not.
Let me give you two personal examples.
In 1992 I operated as KP2A SOAB in the CQ WW
SSB. I was Number one in NA and fifth in the world.
I spent 1/4 of my vacation time, not to mention money
etc, and not even one word in the write-up....
K3EST and N6AR the contest directors mention in
the write- up the first four and not much else. If this is
what happens in the top ten just what do you think
they will talk about the rest of the competitors.
In 1993 I operated as CR7M in the ARRL CW as
SOAB. I happened to Break the European record (the
previous one was also mine as CT2A) and finnish
seventh in the world. I would think a new European
record would be worth mentioning in the write-up.
They mention the breaking of the North America
(VP5F and TI1C), and African record(EA8EA). So
any recognition of my effort! Noooooo. Even worse,
when sending the logs I always include a SAE and
1USD. Do they reply confirming they receive the log?
No they don't. Someone pockets the bill in the way.
And when I ask KR1R in the air about my log and my
1USD he says he cannot discuss his profession on the
air. Jesus will he go to jail?
WE DON'T NEED FURTHER REGIONAL
DIVISIONS.
What we need is to recognise the efforts.
We need to appraise the operators for their
achievements. This will do more for contesting than
numerous and meaningless boxes for regional
division winners(????).
Myself I decided not to participate in the ARRL CW
this year. Hope you can find a CT on the air.
Jose Carlos Cardoso Nunes
CT1BOH, OP @ KP2A,PY0F, HC5M, 4M2BYT,
CT3T, CR7M, CT2A, CQ8M, CS8T, and a lot more
to come.
INTERNET: CT1BOH@MCIMAIL.COM
PACKET: CT1BOH@CS1AAS.CTLX.POR.EU
>From rklein@lobo.rmh.pr1.k12.co.us (Ronald D. Klein) Wed Jan 26 02:50:18 1994
From: rklein@lobo.rmh.pr1.k12.co.us (Ronald D. Klein) (Ronald D. Klein)
Subject: FW: NCJ editorial, etc. (fwd)
Message-ID: <9401260250.AA31351@lobo.rmh.pr1.k12.co.us>
>
> <deleted>
>
> It seems to me the intent here is to operate barefoot... I'd suggest we not
> draw the power line at too restrictive a level for the low power category.
> <deleted>
> drive the $2300 one ;)
>
> 73, Ron - W0OSK
>
>
> Wellllll....if the intent were only to operate barefoot, I'd like to have my
> venerable Yaesu FTdx560 transceiver back as a 'run radio.' It had no
> problem generating a healthy 300 watts output, almost an S unit more
> than my TS690s.
>
> 73, tom WB4IUX
>
I would suggest that the older generation receiver would probably compensate
for any benefit due to the higher output power, and tne net would be zero or
negative when compared to a more current technology receiver. My Swan 500C
used to run 2.5 times the power of the TS830, but there is no comparison on
the receive side... I'd certainly not trade.
Ron - W0OSK
>From WB1HBB 26-Jan-1994 0628 <wrothberg@smoken.enet.dec.com> Wed Jan 26
>11:29:37 1994
From: WB1HBB 26-Jan-1994 0628 <wrothberg@smoken.enet.dec.com> (WB1HBB
26-Jan-1994 0628)
Subject: NH QSO Party
Message-ID: <9401261129.AA02702@us1rmc.bb.dec.com>
NEW HAMPSHIRE QSO PARTY
1994
-----------------------------------------------------
The New Hampshire QSO Party is sponsored annually by the
New Hampshire Amateur Radio Association (NHARA) to further
promote Amateur Radio Activity within the state of New
Hampshire.
-----------------------------------------------------
OBJECT:
For amateur radio operators to contact and exchange QSO
information with as many amateur radio stations as possible
during the published contest time period and in accordance
with the Rules of Operation.
RULES OF OPERATION:
1. Operation will be in accordance with current FCC
rules and open to all license classes.
2. The use of spotting nets, by way of repeaters, packet
digipeaters and nodes, simplex, telephone or in any
other fashion, is prohibited in all categories of
operation.
3. Operation on all bands all modes is permitted, except
on 30 meters, 17 meters and 12 meters. Land based
repeater contacts, digipeaters and nodes are prohibited.
4. Work stations once per band per mode. Modes consist
of digital (RTTY, CW, Packet) and phone (AM, SSB, FM).
5. Amateur satellite transponder operation is allowed.
6. Mobile operation is permitted and encouraged.
EXCHANGE:
NEW HAMPSHIRE STATIONS
Send signal report and county (example 59/9 Rockingham)
Receive from other New Hampshire stations signal report
and county (example - 59/9 Coos)
Receive from non-New Hampshire stations signal report
and state, or signal report and VE province/territory,
or signal report and DXCC country, whichever applies.
(example -59/9 California, 59/9 Ontario, 59/9 Newfoundland,
59/9 France).
NON-NEW HAMPSHIRE STATIONS
Send to NH stations only whichever applies:
A. US STATE - Signal Report and State
B. CANADA -Signal Report and VE Province/Territory
C. DXCC- Signal Report and country (excluding US
Canada, Alaska & Hawaii)
Receive from NH stations only, Signal report and NH
county (example 59/9 Sullivan)
CATEGORIES:
INDIVIDUAL COMPETITION:
1. SINGLE OPERATOR/SINGLE TRANSMITTER ONLY:(SINGLE/SINGLE)
Is defined as a single operator who performs all
transmitting, receiving and logging functions. The log
score will be attributed to that station call sign which
submitted and earned the total point score.
2. MULTI OPERATOR/SINGLE TRANSMITTER ONLY: (MULTI/SINGLE)
Is defined as those obtaining assistance including relief
operators, logger etc. The log score will be attributed
to that station call sign which submitted and earned the
total point score.
3. MOBILE - Is defined as a single transmitter mobile
station who may obtain assistance including relief
operators, loggers etc. This station shall submit one
log with total score being attributed to that station
call sign which submitted and earned the total point
score.
ALL NEW HAMPSHIRE STATIONS operating in any of the three
above categories may compete as a single transmitter station
and at the same time, credit their total log score to ONE
NHARA affiliated multi/multi club station, in which
membership is held. Individual stations crediting their
score to a club must at all times operate from within the
borders of the State of New Hampshire. Each individual
station shall clearly mark the NHARA affiliated club name on
the summary sheet attached to their log.
CLUB COMPETITION:
All NHARA affiliated amateur radio clubs are encouraged to
operate one club station during the NH QSO Party. A club
call sign is defined as an FCC assigned call sign or a call
sign of a club member who has consented to the use of his
call sign for the purposes of this contest.
4. CLUB - MULTI OPERATOR/SINGLE TRANSMITTER (MULTI/SINGLE)
Is defined as a club NHARA affiliated station with one
transmitting location with relief operators assisting
including loggers, etc.
5. CLUB - MULTI OPERATOR/MULTI TRANSMITTER (MULTI/MULTI) Is
defined as a club NHARA affiliated station operating
multiple transmitters from not more than one fixed
location at any one time regardless of band or mode,
regardless of number of operators assisting including
loggers. A club call sign may be rotated among that
club's membership in this category only.
While operating under the club call sign, scores accumulated
by an individual will not count toward the total earned score of
the individual.
Designation of a Bonus Club Station status must be approved
by a pre-announced deadline to be published by the QSO Party
Chairperson.
SCORING:
NEW HAMPSHIRE STATIONS:
Count one (1) point per phone QSO with any Station.
Count two (2) points per digital QSO with any Station.
Count five (5) points per phone QSO with designated bonus
point stations.
Count ten (10) points per digital QSO with designated
bonus point stations.
NON NEW HAMPSHIRE STATIONS:
Count one (1) point per phone QSO with any NH Station.
Count two (2) points per digital QSO with any NH Station.
Count five (5) points per phone QSO with designated bonus
point stations.
Count ten (10) points per digital QSO with designated
bonus point stations.
New Hampshire Club Bonus Point Stations: W1ET, WB1CAG,
N0CUH, WB1HBB, K1RD, AA1EX, W1GUA, WB1ASL, WW1G, N1LT,
K1BKE, KD1GJ, W1OC.
MULTIPLIERS:
NEW HAMPSHIRE STATIONS:
Count number of NH counties, states, (excluding NH)
VE provinces/territories and DXCC countries worked
(excluding US, Canada, Alaska, Hawaii).
NON-NEW HAMPSHIRE STATIONS:
Count number of NH counties worked only.
CW County Abbreviations: BL, CL, CH, CS, GF, HL, MR,
RK, ST, SU (Total 10)
MISCELLANEOUS:
Maritime mobile contacts shall be counted as a QSO but
not as a multiplier.
Washington DC contacts shall be counted as a Maryland
QSO
All logs must be submitted, no later than 31 March of
the year in which the contest takes place, to the QSO
PARTY Chairperson. For purposes of clarification,
separate logs may be submitted, if desired for each
mode. (For example, a separate log for all digital and
a separate log for all phone contacts). Dupe sheets
are required for stations submitting more than 200 QSOs
FINAL SCORE:
Multiply the total QSO points times the multipliers
allotted for your category, for a final score.
AWARDS:
Individual station - A plaque will be awarded to the
highest scoring single operator/
single transmitter station in the
state of NH.
A plaque will be awarded to the
highest scoring multi operator/
single transmitter station in the
state of NH.
Certificates will be awarded to the
highest individual scorer (5 QSO
minimum) in each NH county (except
for the county of the single/single
winner), state, VE province /
territory, and DXCC country.
Club Station- A plaque will be awarded to the
highest scoring club, multi
operator/single transmitter category.
A plaque will be issued to the
highest scoring club multi operator/
multi transmitter category.
Certificates will be awarded for the
second and third place winners in
both categories.
Sponsor's Award- Special recognition will be given
at the discretion of the NHARA to
those stations, in who's opinion
show significant effort.
Suggested Operating Frequencies:
CW -- 1810, 3535, 7035, 14035, 21035, 28035
SSB -- 1875, 3935, 7235, 14280, 21380, 28320, 50.115, 144.205
FM -- 29.610, 52.540, 146.550, 223.500, 446.000, 902.100, 1296.100.
SATELLITE -- All transponders
75 Meter Phone Finale 3950 +/- QSB (Sunday 2300 UTC)
Dates of Contest : Feb 12 thru Feb 13
Hours of Operation: Feb 12, 1900 UTC through Feb 13, 0700 UTC
Feb 13, 1400 UTC through Feb 14, 0200 UTC
_____________________________
LOG SUBMISSION: Logs must be postmarked by 31 March 1994. Include
a SASE with logs when requesting NH QSO contest results. Send logs
and dupe sheets to:
G.E.A.R.S.
Conrad Ekstrom, WB1GXM
P.O. Box 1076
Claremont, NH 03743-1076 USA
>From Randy A Thompson <K5ZD@world.std.com> Wed Jan 26 12:43:29 1994
From: Randy A Thompson <K5ZD@world.std.com> (Randy A Thompson)
Subject: N6TR Version 4.10 Available
Message-ID: <Pine.3.89.9401260705.A9322-0100000@world.std.com>
Why doesn't Tree just advertise his software himself on here! This is
pretty thinly disguised.
In any event, great idea Tree. Now the hard core CT users can see what
you have been working on.
Randy, K5ZD
On Tue, 25 Jan 1994 aa7nx@aol.com wrote:
> Tree has just made Version 4.10 of the N6TR Logging Program available to
> licensed users via the N6TR BBS. The phone number is 503-658-6116, and can
> handle up to 14.4kb, great for fast up/downloads.
>
> Version 4.10 includes support for .CTY country files. Now we can use N6TR
> and/or CT with consistent country support! Also, Tree is currently working on
> developing support in his program for the K1EA Digital Voice Processor (DVP)
> card, another slick function to look forward to.
>
> FYI, to become a licensed user, send $40 US to:
>
> Larry Tyree
> 15125 S. E. Bartell Rd.
> Boring, Oregon 97009
>
> 73 and see you in the 160!
> Mike AA7NX@aol.com
>
>From Takao Kumagai <je1cka@asuka.aerospace-lab.go.jp> Wed Jan 26 21:42:12 1994
From: Takao Kumagai <je1cka@asuka.aerospace-lab.go.jp> (Takao Kumagai)
Subject: What the West REALLY Needs
Message-ID: <9401261242.AA04626@asuka.aerospace-lab.go.jp>
de JE1CKA
I'm not a JA contesters representative at all but know something
about JA contesters...
Well, a half year back, we discussed about the contest activities
from JA in recent years.
Many westcoasters asked me occasionaly, why JA activities lessen
in these days, or I cud not get JA runs even on opening bands... etc
I do not know exactly, but the young radio amateurs are not so
interested in contesting/ HF operation. In fact, cud you hear the
big guns from Univ. JA2YKA, JA3YKC, JA3YBF, JA9YBA in every dx
contests? No, I don't think so. Their activities have been very
low because of less members at the club. JA2YKA has over 20 club
members but a few of them are interested in contesting/HF, most
of them are interested in computing. This has been seen at most
univ. club station.
One another view was introduced that (I do not know this is true
or not), the JA contest activities have been same as 10/15 years
ago. But most of them have beam antennas, amps, $3000Xcvr etc
and they do not like to make S & P but do cqing only. So you cud
not get JA runs but you cud hear many JAs calling CQ 'TEST on
each 3khz separation...
While I operated as KH0AM since '88 in every year, I cud not find
so big defference of JA qsos in each years.
Tack JE1CKA
>From Edward Parish <parish@Think.COM> Wed Jan 26 15:09:53 1994
From: Edward Parish <parish@Think.COM> (Edward Parish)
Subject: DSP Filters
Message-ID: <9401261509.AA11176@thor.think.com>
I have received many replies to my inquiry about DSP filters. As I stated,
I will summarize and repost to the net, probably early next week.
>From Dave Hawes <34703@vlf03v31.ueci.com> Wed Jan 26 15:26:47 1994
From: Dave Hawes <34703@vlf03v31.ueci.com> (Dave Hawes)
Subject: VP9AD in CQ 160
Message-ID: <A7C646643F@vlf03v31.ueci.com>
I will operate VP9AD in the CQ 160 CW contest this weekend. My intent is
to hang out around the upper end of the DX window, about 1835 or so. See
everybody there! 73 - Dave, N3RD (Frankford Radio Club)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Dave Hawes Internet: 34703@vlf03v31.ueci.com
Raytheon Engineers, Valley Forge, PA Voice: 610-254-5167
Fax: 610-254-5134
----------------------------------------------------------------------
>From Walton L. Stinson" <wstinson@csn.org Wed Jan 26 16:25:31 1994
From: Walton L. Stinson" <wstinson@csn.org (Walton L. Stinson)
Subject: shunt fed tower RF
Message-ID: <Pine.3.05.9401260928.B13525-a100000@teal.csn.org>
>
>
> Eric NV6O writes:
> >Anyone have experience with damaged rotator control cable when the tower
> >is loaded for 160 or 80?
>
I have been running a shunt fed tower on 160 for several years. In
my system, the amount of rf on the rotor cable has been directly
related to the quality of the rf ground radial system (not dc ground).
When I first installed the shunt feed with a very limited radial
system, I had enough rf on the cable to move the rotor meter and
light up the led's on my coax switch. Additions to the radial
system, including 150 ft lengths on chicken wire and several
5x5 foot sheets of perforated aluminum have reduced the
rf such that it is no longer noticed. i suspect that you have
a VERY POOR rf ground and that if your swr is low it is because
of very high ground losses, on the order of 30 ohms or so.
73, walt, w0cp
>From John Dorr K1AR" <p00259@psilink.com Wed Jan 26 18:30:54 1994
From: John Dorr K1AR" <p00259@psilink.com (John Dorr K1AR)
Subject: CQ's roving photographer...
Message-ID: <2968694734.0.p00259@psilink.com>
CQ's very own roving photographer, Larry Mulvehill, WB2ZPI, will be in
New Mexico in early February. I am looking for suggestions that you may
have about stations that would make for interesting photography in that
general area. Criteria is: neat antennas, interesting shack, operating
orientation (not just HF contesting, but VHF, Packet, Satellites, etc.).
Larry is willing to drive in a fairly wide circle that would include
areas such as Phoenix, Las Vegas, anywhere in New Mexico, etc.
If you have any good ideas, pass them along (with telephone # if you
have it) ASAP.
Thanks guys! de John, K1AR
p.s. you don't have to live in this area to suggest someone if you have
an idea. Tks
>From Jay Kesterson K0GU x6826 <jayk@hpxxx.fc.hp.com> Wed Jan 26 18:04:13 1994
From: Jay Kesterson K0GU x6826 <jayk@hpxxx.fc.hp.com> (Jay Kesterson K0GU x6826)
Subject: 160 EU freqs?? VHF/UHF gear??
Message-ID: <9401261804.AA09897@hpxxx.fc.hp.com>
Anybody have a list of what frequencies various European countries can
use on 160 meters??
What kind of gear are you VHF/UHF contesters using? Would like to be
able to get on a few of the bands (50,144,?) and at least play in contests.
Looking for something a bit more affordable than the latest $3K Icom.
Any suggestions (beside move somewhere with more population)? I have
no experience in VHF/UHF weak signal work so not sure what is really
required. Email please.
73, Jay K0GU jayk@fc.hp.com
>From David C. Patton" <mudcp3@uxa.ecn.bgu.edu Wed Jan 26 18:24:49 1994
From: David C. Patton" <mudcp3@uxa.ecn.bgu.edu (David C. Patton)
Subject: DX window on 160
Message-ID: <199401261824.AA20315@uxa.ecn.bgu.edu>
A loud VP9AD operating in the DX window is precisely why a DX window
will never work. IF there has to be a window, shouldn't it be for
inter-continental QSOs?
Last year the window was full of loud HH2s, YVs, P4, and KP2.
Good thing I won't operate this contest, because I would need to sit
at 1833 so I could work some Canadians.
Dave Patton, WX3N/9.
Actually the window does promote intercontinental QSOs between VP9,
P4, HH2, and KP2 to EU. At 10 points a Q. What a crock.
>From dcurtis@mipos2.intel.com (Dave Curtis) Wed Jan 26 19:01:47 1994
From: dcurtis@mipos2.intel.com (Dave Curtis) (Dave Curtis)
Subject: VHF SS score, NG0X/rover
Message-ID: <9401261901.AA08829@climax.intel.com>
NG0X/Rover grids CM87 CM96 CM97
126 Q's, 153 pts x 54 grids = 8262
Breakdown:
>From Band QSO's Pts Mults
---- ---- ----- --- -----
CM87 50 11 x1 = 11 x 7
CM87 144 15 x1 = 15 x 6
CM87 432 7 x2 = 14 x 4
CM96 50 10 x1 = 10 x 5
CM96 144 32 x1 = 32 x 10
CM96 432 9 x2 = 18 x 6
CM97 50 11 x1 = 11 x 6
CM97 144 20 x1 = 20 x 6
CM97 432 11 x2 = 22 x 4
--- -----
153 x 54 = 8262
Well, this was my first VHF contest ever, not to mention my first
attempt at roving. It was certainly fun, and I will be back next
time -- *much* smarter. My goals were modest: last year WB9AJZ had
the highest Pacific division rover score with 7392. I wanted to
beat that, and did. I expect Pacific division to be much more
competitive this year, as 'AJZ did 125,580 last June for 5th place
among rovers, and he seemed to be everywhere this past weekend.
Operating locations:
1) CM87 Castle Rock Ridge, Summit Rock
2) CM96 Fremont Peak
3) CM97 Mt. Hamilton Road, just below summit on West side.
Equipment:
50 MHz: TS-690S, 3el CushCraft Yagi
144 MHz: FT-736R, 7el M2 Yagi
432 MHz: " , 11el M2 Yagi
Conditions:
I guess I missed the 6M opening, *sigh*. Fremont Peak has a
bunch of broadcast/commercial stuff on the tower, and I got
some intermod on 432, and intermittent 20+ noise on 50, which may
also have been intermod. WX was foggy/rainy/chilly a lot of
the time -- but I'm not whining -- I note that Dakota Division
fields more rovers in January than we do, and having lived in
Minneapolis for 10 years, I know what they go through.
Actions required before next VHF test:
1) Bolt antennas to roof, and replace Armstrong rotator with one
from Ford. I thought my set-up/tear-down routine was pretty simple,
but it was too much work for opportunistic operating. With a
zero set-up-time antenna system, any turnout is good for a few quick
QSO's. Besides, then there won't be a clutter of stowed antennas
blocking access to the cooler!
2) Bring a compass. Sounds obvious. It is obvious. Every packing
list I ever created included "compass". I forgot it. Next time it
will be permanently bolted to the vehicle.
3) Have omni-directional antenna and mobile-in-motion operating capability
on one of (or better yet -- both) 6M and 2M SSB. I was limited to FM
for mobile contacts, which netted a few Q's, but here is one place
where I could have been much more effective.
4) Have a solid itinerary planned in advance. Since this was my first
VHF test, I wasn't quite sure what to expect, so I "just did it".
Next time: more grids, better route planning.
5) Bandpass filters to reduce intermod.
6) More bands?
See you in June!
73, Dave
|