Anybody have the address/protocol to get onto the DX and QRP reflectors?
Geoff WA1U
FOXG@WCSUB.CTSTATEU.EDU
>From robert penneys <penneys@freezer.cns.udel.edu> Fri Oct 29 03:20:12 1993
From: robert penneys <penneys@freezer.cns.udel.edu> (robert penneys)
Subject: WN3K at N2MM for CQWW
Message-ID: <9310290220.AA22332@freezer.cns.udel.edu>
I'll be at N2MM m/s or m/m. CU on contest and GO FRC!!! Bob WN3K
>From clay rudolf <rtclay@uxa.cso.uiuc.edu> Fri Oct 29 04:06:31 1993
From: clay rudolf <rtclay@uxa.cso.uiuc.edu> (clay rudolf)
Subject: Coax Stub question
Message-ID: <Pine.3.05.9310282231.A4133-a100000@uxa.cso.uiuc.edu>
Ok, so I've decided to try using 2 radios for the SS. As the two antennas
at W9YH are rather close together (a Butternut HF6V and HF5B about 15 feet
apart), I should probably use some coax stubs to avoid completely
destroying the second receiver when running high power.
The question is, has anyone succesfully used coax stubs on a
multi-band antenna? For example, could I take a coax switch, put a tee
connector on the common terminal, and put a tuned stub on each pole? Then,
for example, when I was running stations on 40 and wanted to listen on 20,
I could just set the switch for the 20m stub. I guess the coax switch
would slightly alter the length of the stubs, but they could be cut to
length with the switch in place.
Has anyone tried this?
R. Torsten Clay, N4OGW r-clay@uiuc.edu or n4ogw@uiuc.edu
>From Skelton, Tom" <TSkelton@engineer.clemsonsc.NCR.COM Fri Oct 29 17:02:00
>1993
From: Skelton, Tom" <TSkelton@engineer.clemsonsc.NCR.COM (Skelton, Tom)
Subject: need address
Message-ID: <2CD13ECB@admin.ClemsonSC.NCR.COM>
For DX, send a subscribe to:
dx-REQUEST@unbc.edu
73, Tom WB4IUX
ps: Does someone have the VHF address? tnx!
----------
From: FOXG
To: cq-contest
Subject: need address
Anybody have the address/protocol to get onto the DX and QRP reflectors?
Geoff WA1U
FOXG@WCSUB.CTSTATEU.EDU
>From contest@mosbos.msk.su () Fri Oct 29 15:06:44 1993
From: contest@mosbos.msk.su () (contest@mosbos.msk.su ())
Subject: UZ3A... in CQWW
Message-ID: <AAqDIqiecA@mosbos.msk.su>
Hi All
Please pay your attention that:
There will be some club stations with familiar call signs:
UZ3AWO
UZ3AZO
UZ3AXO
(All stations: Multi Op.- All Bands)
which will be very active in CQWW SSB (and CW).
Be careful. Dont confuse them.
Best regards & GL in the CONTEST.
Dima, UV3DCX (chief UZ3AWO A.R.C.)
--
------------------------------------------------------------------
| Dima Guskov | Call: UV3DCX: PACKET: uv3dcx@r3ares.#mos.rus.eu |
| "MBI, Ltd" | Internet: uv3dcx@mosbos.msk.su |
-----------------------------------------------------------------
>From Edward Parish <parish@Think.COM> Fri Oct 29 16:31:57 1993
From: Edward Parish <parish@Think.COM> (Edward Parish)
Subject: need address
Message-ID: <9310291531.AA22224@thor.think.com>
From: "Skelton, Tom" <TSkelton@engineer.clemsonsc.NCR.COM>
For DX, send a subscribe to:
dx-REQUEST@unbc.edu
73, Tom WB4IUX
ps: Does someone have the VHF address? tnx!
----------
From: FOXG
To: cq-contest
Subject: need address
Anybody have the address/protocol to get onto the DX and QRP reflectors?
Geoff WA1U
FOXG@WCSUB.CTSTATEU.EDU
QRP: qrp-request@think.com
exchange is name and call (plus wx, equipment, antenna system, age, ...)
;^)
>From Fred Hopengarten" <k1vr%k1vr@uunet.uu.net Sun Oct 31 10:31:41 1993
From: Fred Hopengarten" <k1vr%k1vr@uunet.uu.net (Fred Hopengarten)
Subject: Coax Stub question
Message-ID: <2cd39412.k1vr@k1vr.UUCP>
On Thu, 28 Oct 1993 22:06:31 -0500 (CDT), "clay rudolf" N4OGW
<rtclay@uxa.cso.uiuc.edu> wrote:
> The question is, has anyone succesfully used coax stubs on a
> multi-band antenna? For example, could I take a coax switch, put a tee
> connector on the common terminal, and put a tuned stub on each pole? >
>
K1VR: Yeah, I tried it. I put a barrel onto the back of an AL-1200 with a
B+W coax switch, and switched in and out a 20 meter stub made of RG-213 for
my TH6 stack which is only 55 feet from a TH7 tower. It worked. But the
ICE BPF's between the tcvr and the amp work better (though they cost more,
and, most painfully, require a lot of 3 foot jumpers). I do not have any
measurements. I also use stubs of 75 ohm hardline which are left in the
line at all times for the 40 and 80 meter antennas, which are single band
antennas, and they seem to work well.
--
Fred Hopengarten K1VR
Six Willarch Road * Lincoln, MA 01773-5105
home + office telephone: 617/259-0088 (FAX on demand)
"Big antennas, high in the sky, are better than small ones, low."
>From Fred Hopengarten" <k1vr%k1vr@uunet.uu.net Sun Oct 31 10:42:24 1993
From: Fred Hopengarten" <k1vr%k1vr@uunet.uu.net (Fred Hopengarten)
Subject: 286 and CT
Message-ID: <2cd39696.k1vr@k1vr.UUCP>
On Wed, 27 Oct 1993 16:10:56 -0700 (PDT), "jayt" WS7I
<jayt@comtch.iea.com> wrote:
> Well a couple of local guys K7MM and WB7AVD are having trouble
getting their CT286 to work. 386 that they had was working fine.
But the 286 got some kind of DOS error message and wouldn't load.
K1VR: While AA2DU was doing yeoman's work this past weekend, I
spent 8.5 hours trying everything that AA1AA, AD1C and K1EA
suggested in an attempt to load CT286. CT386 worked just fine on
my 386DX40, but CT286 and CT86 just wouldn't load into my 286-12,
which was to be the second computer. JP, AA2DU, was entered in
the single op multi transmitter category, which means two radios
and two amplifiers. It should have also meant two computers, as
K3WW has demonstrated that two computers is the way to go, or you
spend all weekend going: <Enter>, <Up Arrow>, Alt F1, <Down
Arrow>.
CT86 yielded a message which said there was a problem with the
vseg manager. CT286 said something like DOS/16M [35] General
Protection Error and then a bunch of registers. Yes, I had ZPM
loaded, as is required for CT286. No solution yet, but let's see
if K1EA got any other complaints from CT 8.45 286 users.
--
Fred Hopengarten K1VR
Six Willarch Road * Lincoln, MA 01773-5105
home + office telephone: 617/259-0088 (FAX on demand)
"Big antennas, high in the sky, are better than small ones, low."
|