Subject: | No subject |
---|---|
From: | george554@austin.relay.ucm.org (george554@austin.relay.ucm.org) |
Date: | Tue Nov 17 23:04:40 1992 |
k0gu writes--- >Once the band matured (to EU and JA) the single 8 at 40 feet was >generally 1 to 3 db better than the stack, no matter what the phasing. i have seen this on 10m at n5au the 50ft high 5 ele beam is the best antenna on the lot when the band is really open. that is when the highest angles stuff is coming in. on 15m we used to have a 3 high stack of 5 ele beams. 135/90/45 we could feed the top two, bottom two or any of the three. the top stack would open and close the band. the lower two would be equal to the top two but not usually any better. when the band was really hot (for short periods of time) the bottom antenna was the best by a good bit. again i dont see any real suprises here. our soultion was to take the 45' high antenna down and put it up at 175ft. since the lower stack was never (very rarely) better than the top stack. (and then only to western europe) that antenna is much more useful at 157ft than at 45ft. who cares if you are are another 5db or so louder into g4 for some short part of the opening when you are already 20db or move over 9? it is much more important to be able to work the ones nobody else can. geoiii wb5vzl |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | more on 4 high stacks, Jay Kesterson K0GU x6826 |
---|---|
Next by Date: | G3FXB, Andy_Melanyin |
Previous by Thread: | No subject, george554@austin.relay.ucm.org |
Next by Thread: | No subject, george554@austin.relay.ucm.org |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |