Yaesu
[Top] [All Lists]

[Yaesu] FT-1000MP TO BE CONTROLLED BY AEA RL-1 RADIOLINK?

To: <yaesu@contesting.com>
Subject: [Yaesu] FT-1000MP TO BE CONTROLLED BY AEA RL-1 RADIOLINK?
From: f6dex@compuserve.com (Laurent Labourie)
Date: Tue, 4 Nov 1997 13:07:15 -0500
Hello 

I don't know the radiolink from AEA. I only give some information about CAT
commands with different type of transceivers.

You must distinguish "data to send" or CAT command and "data to receive".

All the Yaesu transceivers FT-990/890/840/900/1000MP/1000D/1000 are using
the same CAT commands (data to send). There is some difference about the
filter selection between FT990/1000D - FT840/890/900 - FT1000MD/FT1000D and
of course in the frequency settings with the sub vfo of the FT1000MP or
FT1000D. The FT-920 is very complicated because it is necessary to download
first the configuration flags to know what VFO is in use...

BUT!!!! Warning :  concerning the data to receive all theses transceivers
are different.

You have the folowing groups of similar transceivers :

1) FT990
2) FT840/890/900
3) FT1000MP
4) FT920
5) FT1000D

There is an another complication : early firmwares version of FT990/890 and
the FT1000 (to distinguish from the FT1000D)
are still different ! they return all the memory content on each UPDATE
command. So a such transceiver is not able to work properly with a CAT
software except in a manual configuration.

I hope these considerations helpfull - you may download a free software for
MS-DOS : Soft990. This software was written to run with the
FT990/890/840/900/920/1000MP and in test with the FT1000D at :

http://ourworld.compuserve.com/homepages/f6dex

This software includes a terminal module.

Best 73 - Laurent F6DEX

--
FAQ on WWW:               http://www.qsl.net/k7on/yaesu.html
Submissions:              yaesu@contesting.com
Administrative requests:  yaesu-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems:                 owner-yaesu@contesting.com
Search:                   http://www.contesting.com/km9p/search.htm

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>