Not to mention the that it is only Double Conversion versus Quad for the
MP.
>----------
>From: Andrew Williamson[SMTP:andrew@gi0nwg.demon.co.uk]
>Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 1997 1:52 PM
>To: Yaesu@contesting.com
>Subject: [Yaesu] FT920 (was New Yaesu Amp?)
>
>In message <199706041437.KAA26287@cliff.concentric.net>, Ron Galbraith
>N0EC <N0EC@concentric.net> writes
>>I played with the new FT920 at HRO for a couple of hours the other day, and
>>was very impressed with the DSP.
>
>Interesting observation. I played with an FT920 into a 20M monobander
>at around 100ft, and was very disappointed with the 'sharpness' of the
>DSP compared with my FT1000MP. Maybe the fact that the DSP only closes
>to 500Hz makes it sound worse (or was it the fact that it is only audio
>DSP compared to 'IF' DSP in the 'MP). 500Hz is just not tight enough.
>We know Yaesu can implement good, narrow DSP (FT1000MP), so why didn't
>they put narrower DSP into the FT920. This one point spoils what
>otherwise could be a useful radio.
>
>Any other observations ?
>
>Andrew Williamson GI0NWG / AC6WI
>
>--
>FAQ on WWW: http://www.qsl.net/k7on/yaesu.html
>Submissions: yaesu@contesting.com
>Administrative requests: yaesu-REQUEST@contesting.com
>Problems: owner-yaesu@contesting.com
>Search: http://www.contesting.com/km9p/search.htm
>
--
FAQ on WWW: http://www.qsl.net/k7on/yaesu.html
Submissions: yaesu@contesting.com
Administrative requests: yaesu-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems: owner-yaesu@contesting.com
Search: http://www.contesting.com/km9p/search.htm
|