>>1) The receiver recovery time in QSK with the AGC on "fast" is
>> much worse than on "slow." Break-in performance with the
>> AGC set at "slow" is pretty good, but I would like to be able
>> to leave the AGC on "fast" where I usually operate the receiver.
>> (Anyone else notice this?)
I don't use QSK and use the TRLog PTT signal for keying the tranceiver,
but I became irritated by AGC recovery during the 160m contest. Ultimately
I switched to AGC OFF. I can't say I have any comparison to anything else.
I blame this for missing prefixes at times when running during the contest.
Again, I have no basis for comparison.
73, Brian ke7gh@primenet.com
--
FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/yaesufaq.html
Submissions: yaesu@contesting.com
Administrative requests: yaesu-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems: ke7gh@contesting.com
Sponsored by: Akorn Access, Inc & KM9P
|