WriteLog
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [WriteLog] MMTTY FSK vs Rttyrite FSK

To: K1GU@arrl.net, Writelog Reflector <writelog@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [WriteLog] MMTTY FSK vs Rttyrite FSK
From: Jeff Stai <wk6i.jeff@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 9 Mar 2018 09:44:24 -0800
List-post: <mailto:writelog@contesting.com>
I've had it asserted to me that the 45.45 baud timing in native Rttyrite is
better than MMTTY, but in a private conversation with the Writelog
developers they told me they're both the same**. You will have Windows
induced jitter in either case.

That said, if you want the best timing/jitter specs, use either AFSK or
(new feature) use Rttyrite with TinyFSK (an Arduino based FSK generator).
Or use a Microham product that makes FSK.

The 2tone add on also has some good ways to generate clean FSK. Check the
2tone docs for more info.

73 jeff wk6i

** Found it, from WX5D: "I don't know why MMTTY or RttyRite would make a
difference because in both cases the accuracy of the timing is dependent on
the underlying COM port, which would be the same."


On Thu, Mar 8, 2018 at 6:30 PM, Ned Swartz <nosatisfaction@bellsouth.net>
wrote:

> MMTTY FSK vs Rttyrite FSK, is there an advantage to one method over the
> other? (one radio, one computer))
>
> Ned K1GU
> _______________________________________________
> WriteLog mailing list
> WriteLog@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/writelog
> WriteLog on the web:  http://www.writelog.com/
>



-- 
Jeff Stai ~ wk6i.jeff@gmail.com
Twisted Oak Winery ~ http://www.twistedoak.com/
Facebook ~ http://www.facebook.com/twistedoak
RTTY op at W7RN
_______________________________________________
WriteLog mailing list
WriteLog@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/writelog
WriteLog on the web:  http://www.writelog.com/

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>