Thanks for that info, Steve. Let me know when it's available in the next
release and I'll upgrade to that version. I'm due anyway.
Dick
W0RAA
Sent from my iPad 2
On Sep 2, 2012, at 5:19 PM, writelog-request@contesting.com wrote:
> Send WriteLog mailing list submissions to
> writelog@contesting.com
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/writelog
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> writelog-request@contesting.com
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
> writelog-owner@contesting.com
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of WriteLog digest..."
>
>
> Today's Topics:
>
> 1. Russian contest cabrillo (Doug Nelson)
> 2. Re: Russian contest cabrillo (SP5KP)
> 3. Bug in COQP Module? (DickT-W0RAA)
> 4. Bug in CW Open by K0PC Module? (Rick Tavan N6XI)
> 5. Re: Bug in CW Open by K0PC Module? (Gary AL9A)
> 6. Re: Bug in COQP Module? (Gary AL9A)
> 7. Re: Bug in COQP Module? (DickT-W0RAA)
> 8. Re: Bug in COQP Module? (Steve Woodruff)
> 9. Re: Bug in COQP Module? (Steve Woodruff)
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Sun, 02 Sep 2012 09:53:33 -0700
> From: Doug Nelson <dougn1@me.com>
> To: WriteLog@contesting.com
> Subject: [WriteLog] Russian contest cabrillo
> Message-ID: <91EF4D22-2D19-4E8F-94A8-A63F7D41CFE4@me.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; CHARSET=US-ASCII
>
> Apparently no cabrillo support in the SM6SRW module. Do I need to use an
> external ADIF to Cabrillo converter to generate or will they accept ADIF?
>
> Thanks....Doug K6HGF
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 2
> Date: Sun, 2 Sep 2012 17:07:24 -0000
> From: "SP5KP" <sp5kp@interia.pl>
> To: "Doug Nelson" <dougn1@me.com>, <WriteLog@contesting.com>
> Subject: Re: [WriteLog] Russian contest cabrillo
> Message-ID: <C6AA5811FBF6450C8621365FEAFCF575@KPPeCet>
> Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1";
> reply-type=original
>
> Hi Doug
>
> Please look on good free conwerter adif2cabr by SP7DQR
>
> http://www.sp7dqr.waw.pl/en/converters.php
>
> -----
>
> Pozdrawiam
> VY 73!
>
> Krzysztof "Chris"
> SP5KP, 3Z5W, 3Z40KP, ex SN5N
>
> admin portalu : http://pga-zawody.eham.pl
>
> eMail: sp5kp@wp.pl
> Skype: sp5kp.
>
> Member of:
> SPDXC#430, SPCWC#49, EPC#6350
>
> GSM: +48 603 310037
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Doug Nelson" <dougn1@me.com>
> To: <WriteLog@contesting.com>
> Sent: Sunday, September 02, 2012 4:53 PM
> Subject: [WriteLog] Russian contest cabrillo
>
>
>> Apparently no cabrillo support in the SM6SRW module. Do I need to use an
>> external ADIF to Cabrillo converter to generate or will they accept ADIF?
>>
>> Thanks....Doug K6HGF
>> _______________________________________________
>> WriteLog mailing list
>> WriteLog@contesting.com
>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/writelog
>> WriteLog on the web: http://www.writelog.com/
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 3
> Date: Sun, 2 Sep 2012 12:14:39 -0600
> From: "DickT-W0RAA" <dickt@w0raa.com>
> To: "Writelog Reflector" <writelog@contesting.com>
> Subject: [WriteLog] Bug in COQP Module?
> Message-ID: <FC7AC8E3976E485E85EB8F743EA547D2@890727fb58a94f5>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
>
> During the COQP (Colorado QSO Party) this weekend, I noticed a real problem
> with the COQP Module for the contest.
>
> The rules stated that a DX station give their Name & DXCC Prefix in lieu of
> a
> Name & S/P.
>
> When I worked a DX Station (i.e. KP2) I entered the name I was given and
> then entered KP2. WL refused to accept it. I found the same thing with a
> K6 that was in XE2 land. I logged his name and XE and again, WL refused to
> accept it. There were a couple others that had the same results. I am
> running
> Ver 11.02B of Writelog. As a result of this I was not able to claim the
> QSO's.
>
> Is there a different module for this contest or was there a possibility that
> I may
> have been causing the problem with an incorrect setting? Any
> help/suggestions
> will be appreciated.
>
> 73,
>
> Dick
> W0RAA
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 4
> Date: Sun, 2 Sep 2012 11:26:29 -0700
> From: Rick Tavan N6XI <rtavan@gmail.com>
> To: Writelog user group <writelog@contesting.com>
> Subject: [WriteLog] Bug in CW Open by K0PC Module?
> Message-ID:
> <CANVONAL_-OD_C=zGPxP_wS2+WcCRUjwvcntvwDbNSwpVh8Q91Q@mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
>
> The K0PC CW Open module seems to support M (multiplier) fields of only 2
> characters. It is normal to have over 99 multipliers, so e.g. mult 123
> displays as 23. I tried adding a second space to "M " in the fields setup
> but that seems to qualify as a forbidden change - you can add fields but
> if you want to change any you have to start over defining all fields by
> hand. I've never really understood the relationship between UI-driven field
> definitions and custom contest-specific driver modules, so I may be doing
> something wrong here. Or maybe it's a bug.
>
> Any advice?
>
> 73,
>
> /Rick
>
> --
> Rick Tavan N6XI
> Truckee, CA
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 5
> Date: Sun, 2 Sep 2012 10:59:22 -0800
> From: "Gary AL9A" <al9a@mtaonline.net>
> To: "Rick Tavan N6XI" <rtavan@gmail.com>, "Writelog user group"
> <writelog@contesting.com>
> Subject: Re: [WriteLog] Bug in CW Open by K0PC Module?
> Message-ID: <8FF2DA7E8A614DD994072FC2117E0D34@AL9APC>
> Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1";
> reply-type=original
>
> Rick,
>
> Field width is set at the time the field name is created. If the M field is
> only 2 characters wide it cannot be modified to be one character wider. If
> you start all over and redefine all the fields in the module you can make
> the M field wider, but I'm not sure if the multiplier logic will still work
> so it may end up making the problem worse.
>
> 73,
> Gary AL9A
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Rick Tavan N6XI" <rtavan@gmail.com>
> To: "Writelog user group" <writelog@contesting.com>
> Sent: September 02, 2012 10:26 AM
> Subject: [WriteLog] Bug in CW Open by K0PC Module?
>
>
>> The K0PC CW Open module seems to support M (multiplier) fields of only 2
>> characters. It is normal to have over 99 multipliers, so e.g. mult 123
>> displays as 23. I tried adding a second space to "M " in the fields setup
>> but that seems to qualify as a forbidden change - you can add fields but
>> if you want to change any you have to start over defining all fields by
>> hand. I've never really understood the relationship between UI-driven
>> field
>> definitions and custom contest-specific driver modules, so I may be doing
>> something wrong here. Or maybe it's a bug.
>>
>> Any advice?
>>
>> 73,
>>
>> /Rick
>>
>> --
>> Rick Tavan N6XI
>> Truckee, CA
>> _______________________________________________
>> WriteLog mailing list
>> WriteLog@contesting.com
>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/writelog
>> WriteLog on the web: http://www.writelog.com/
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 6
> Date: Sun, 2 Sep 2012 11:02:02 -0800
> From: "Gary AL9A" <al9a@mtaonline.net>
> To: "DickT-W0RAA" <dickt@w0raa.com>, "Writelog Reflector"
> <writelog@contesting.com>
> Subject: Re: [WriteLog] Bug in COQP Module?
> Message-ID: <28A0310FD6A545B2B25E2061FB9FE26D@AL9APC>
> Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1";
> reply-type=original
>
> Dick,
>
> It sounds like the CO contest sponsors have modified the exchange to be sent
> by a DX station from what it was when the COQP module was created. If that
> is the case Steve N9OH will have to make a modification to bring the module
> up to the current rules.
>
> 73,
> Gary AL9A
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "DickT-W0RAA" <dickt@w0raa.com>
> To: "Writelog Reflector" <writelog@contesting.com>
> Sent: September 02, 2012 10:14 AM
> Subject: [WriteLog] Bug in COQP Module?
>
>
>> During the COQP (Colorado QSO Party) this weekend, I noticed a real
>> problem
>> with the COQP Module for the contest.
>>
>> The rules stated that a DX station give their Name & DXCC Prefix in lieu
>> of
>> a
>> Name & S/P.
>>
>> When I worked a DX Station (i.e. KP2) I entered the name I was given and
>> then entered KP2. WL refused to accept it. I found the same thing with a
>> K6 that was in XE2 land. I logged his name and XE and again, WL refused
>> to
>> accept it. There were a couple others that had the same results. I am
>> running
>> Ver 11.02B of Writelog. As a result of this I was not able to claim the
>> QSO's.
>>
>> Is there a different module for this contest or was there a possibility
>> that
>> I may
>> have been causing the problem with an incorrect setting? Any
>> help/suggestions
>> will be appreciated.
>>
>> 73,
>>
>> Dick
>> W0RAA
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> WriteLog mailing list
>> WriteLog@contesting.com
>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/writelog
>> WriteLog on the web: http://www.writelog.com/
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 7
> Date: Sun, 2 Sep 2012 16:55:33 -0600
> From: "DickT-W0RAA" <dickt@w0raa.com>
> To: "Writelog Reflector" <writelog@contesting.com>, "Gary AL9A"
> <al9a@mtaonline.net>
> Subject: Re: [WriteLog] Bug in COQP Module?
> Message-ID: <6F41D6E917904F25B091D427B1C2845A@890727fb58a94f5>
> Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1";
> reply-type=response
>
> Hi, Gary...
>
> Hopefully Steve is following the thread and will look ito it when he can
> find the time. I know
> he's probably busy with a lot of things requiring more priority. But,
> hopefully he will
> get a chance to look into it.
>
> Steve? Are you watching? :)
>
> Dick
> W0RAA
>
> PS: I received an e-mail from Hal Kennedy, N4GG and he said a Shift/Enter
> will force a
> QSO into the log and it can be cleaned up in the Cabrillo file later.
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Gary AL9A" <al9a@mtaonline.net>
> To: "DickT-W0RAA" <dickt@w0raa.com>; "Writelog Reflector"
> <writelog@contesting.com>
> Sent: Sunday, September 02, 2012 1:02 PM
> Subject: Re: [WriteLog] Bug in COQP Module?
>
>
>> Dick,
>>
>> It sounds like the CO contest sponsors have modified the exchange to be
>> sent by a DX station from what it was when the COQP module was created.
>> If that is the case Steve N9OH will have to make a modification to bring
>> the module up to the current rules.
>>
>> 73,
>> Gary AL9A
>>
>>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "DickT-W0RAA" <dickt@w0raa.com>
>> To: "Writelog Reflector" <writelog@contesting.com>
>> Sent: September 02, 2012 10:14 AM
>> Subject: [WriteLog] Bug in COQP Module?
>>
>>
>>> During the COQP (Colorado QSO Party) this weekend, I noticed a real
>>> problem
>>> with the COQP Module for the contest.
>>>
>>> The rules stated that a DX station give their Name & DXCC Prefix in lieu
>>> of
>>> a
>>> Name & S/P.
>>>
>>> When I worked a DX Station (i.e. KP2) I entered the name I was given and
>>> then entered KP2. WL refused to accept it. I found the same thing with
>>> a
>>> K6 that was in XE2 land. I logged his name and XE and again, WL refused
>>> to
>>> accept it. There were a couple others that had the same results. I am
>>> running
>>> Ver 11.02B of Writelog. As a result of this I was not able to claim the
>>> QSO's.
>>>
>>> Is there a different module for this contest or was there a possibility
>>> that
>>> I may
>>> have been causing the problem with an incorrect setting? Any
>>> help/suggestions
>>> will be appreciated.
>>>
>>> 73,
>>>
>>> Dick
>>> W0RAA
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> WriteLog mailing list
>>> WriteLog@contesting.com
>>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/writelog
>>> WriteLog on the web: http://www.writelog.com/
>>
>>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 8
> Date: Sun, 2 Sep 2012 19:00:37 -0400
> From: Steve Woodruff <steve@n9oh.com>
> To: DickT-W0RAA <dickt@w0raa.com>
> Cc: Writelog Reflector <writelog@contesting.com>, Gary AL9A
> <al9a@mtaonline.net>
> Subject: Re: [WriteLog] Bug in COQP Module?
> Message-ID:
> <CALK10zdH42VAH-2UO-t9ok61+h+YtB=b3zD6KSvKeaq9dCR-mg@mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
>
> Hi Dick & Gary,
>
> I'd just keep logging it as "DX" for now, or use the Shift+Enter trick if
> that works for you.
>
> I was unaware of any rule changes for COQP requiring a new exchange format,
> so that?s why it was not accepting your DX station's prefix in the QSO
> Entry Window.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Steve N9OH
>
>
> On Sun, Sep 2, 2012 at 6:55 PM, DickT-W0RAA <dickt@w0raa.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi, Gary...
>>
>> Hopefully Steve is following the thread and will look ito it when he can
>> find the time. I know
>> he's probably busy with a lot of things requiring more priority. But,
>> hopefully he will
>> get a chance to look into it.
>>
>> Steve? Are you watching? :)
>>
>> Dick
>> W0RAA
>>
>> PS: I received an e-mail from Hal Kennedy, N4GG and he said a Shift/Enter
>> will force a
>> QSO into the log and it can be cleaned up in the Cabrillo file later.
>>
>>
>> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Gary AL9A" <al9a@mtaonline.net>
>> To: "DickT-W0RAA" <dickt@w0raa.com>; "Writelog Reflector" <
>> writelog@contesting.com>
>> Sent: Sunday, September 02, 2012 1:02 PM
>> Subject: Re: [WriteLog] Bug in COQP Module?
>>
>>
>> Dick,
>>>
>>> It sounds like the CO contest sponsors have modified the exchange to be
>>> sent by a DX station from what it was when the COQP module was created. If
>>> that is the case Steve N9OH will have to make a modification to bring the
>>> module up to the current rules.
>>>
>>> 73,
>>> Gary AL9A
>>>
>>>
>>> ----- Original Message ----- From: "DickT-W0RAA" <dickt@w0raa.com>
>>> To: "Writelog Reflector" <writelog@contesting.com>
>>> Sent: September 02, 2012 10:14 AM
>>> Subject: [WriteLog] Bug in COQP Module?
>>>
>>>
>>> During the COQP (Colorado QSO Party) this weekend, I noticed a real
>>>> problem
>>>> with the COQP Module for the contest.
>>>>
>>>> The rules stated that a DX station give their Name & DXCC Prefix in lieu
>>>> of
>>>> a
>>>> Name & S/P.
>>>>
>>>> When I worked a DX Station (i.e. KP2) I entered the name I was given and
>>>> then entered KP2. WL refused to accept it. I found the same thing with
>>>> a
>>>> K6 that was in XE2 land. I logged his name and XE and again, WL refused
>>>> to
>>>> accept it. There were a couple others that had the same results. I am
>>>> running
>>>> Ver 11.02B of Writelog. As a result of this I was not able to claim the
>>>> QSO's.
>>>>
>>>> Is there a different module for this contest or was there a possibility
>>>> that
>>>> I may
>>>> have been causing the problem with an incorrect setting? Any
>>>> help/suggestions
>>>> will be appreciated.
>>>>
>>>> 73,
>>>>
>>>> Dick
>>>> W0RAA
>>>>
>>>> ______________________________**_________________
>>>> WriteLog mailing list
>>>> WriteLog@contesting.com
>>>> http://lists.contesting.com/**mailman/listinfo/writelog<http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/writelog>
>>>> WriteLog on the web: http://www.writelog.com/
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 9
> Date: Sun, 2 Sep 2012 19:19:51 -0400
> From: Steve Woodruff <steve@n9oh.com>
> To: DickT-W0RAA <dickt@w0raa.com>
> Cc: Writelog Reflector <writelog@contesting.com>, Gary AL9A
> <al9a@mtaonline.net>
> Subject: Re: [WriteLog] Bug in COQP Module?
> Message-ID:
> <CALK10zenzjTjAfX-OV4mhNoXG6QuzhaCCB6BcM3bQmnfLsWwAA@mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
>
> Hi Guys,
>
> I do have a new COQP module which simply lets you log DX for the SPC of the
> DX station but when you create the cabrillo log, it correctly lists the
> station's DXCC prefix instead of "DX". We'll get this into the next
> release of WriteLog!
>
> Thanks,
>
> Steve N9OH
>
>
> On Sun, Sep 2, 2012 at 7:00 PM, Steve Woodruff <steve@n9oh.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi Dick & Gary,
>>
>> I'd just keep logging it as "DX" for now, or use the Shift+Enter trick if
>> that works for you.
>>
>> I was unaware of any rule changes for COQP requiring a new exchange
>> format, so that?s why it was not accepting your DX station's prefix in the
>> QSO Entry Window.
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Steve N9OH
>>
>>
>> On Sun, Sep 2, 2012 at 6:55 PM, DickT-W0RAA <dickt@w0raa.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi, Gary...
>>>
>>> Hopefully Steve is following the thread and will look ito it when he can
>>> find the time. I know
>>> he's probably busy with a lot of things requiring more priority. But,
>>> hopefully he will
>>> get a chance to look into it.
>>>
>>> Steve? Are you watching? :)
>>>
>>> Dick
>>> W0RAA
>>>
>>> PS: I received an e-mail from Hal Kennedy, N4GG and he said a
>>> Shift/Enter will force a
>>> QSO into the log and it can be cleaned up in the Cabrillo file later.
>>>
>>>
>>> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Gary AL9A" <al9a@mtaonline.net>
>>> To: "DickT-W0RAA" <dickt@w0raa.com>; "Writelog Reflector" <
>>> writelog@contesting.com>
>>> Sent: Sunday, September 02, 2012 1:02 PM
>>> Subject: Re: [WriteLog] Bug in COQP Module?
>>>
>>>
>>> Dick,
>>>>
>>>> It sounds like the CO contest sponsors have modified the exchange to be
>>>> sent by a DX station from what it was when the COQP module was created. If
>>>> that is the case Steve N9OH will have to make a modification to bring the
>>>> module up to the current rules.
>>>>
>>>> 73,
>>>> Gary AL9A
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ----- Original Message ----- From: "DickT-W0RAA" <dickt@w0raa.com>
>>>> To: "Writelog Reflector" <writelog@contesting.com>
>>>> Sent: September 02, 2012 10:14 AM
>>>> Subject: [WriteLog] Bug in COQP Module?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> During the COQP (Colorado QSO Party) this weekend, I noticed a real
>>>>> problem
>>>>> with the COQP Module for the contest.
>>>>>
>>>>> The rules stated that a DX station give their Name & DXCC Prefix in
>>>>> lieu of
>>>>> a
>>>>> Name & S/P.
>>>>>
>>>>> When I worked a DX Station (i.e. KP2) I entered the name I was given and
>>>>> then entered KP2. WL refused to accept it. I found the same thing
>>>>> with a
>>>>> K6 that was in XE2 land. I logged his name and XE and again, WL
>>>>> refused to
>>>>> accept it. There were a couple others that had the same results. I am
>>>>> running
>>>>> Ver 11.02B of Writelog. As a result of this I was not able to claim the
>>>>> QSO's.
>>>>>
>>>>> Is there a different module for this contest or was there a possibility
>>>>> that
>>>>> I may
>>>>> have been causing the problem with an incorrect setting? Any
>>>>> help/suggestions
>>>>> will be appreciated.
>>>>>
>>>>> 73,
>>>>>
>>>>> Dick
>>>>> W0RAA
>>>>>
>>>>> ______________________________**_________________
>>>>> WriteLog mailing list
>>>>> WriteLog@contesting.com
>>>>> http://lists.contesting.com/**mailman/listinfo/writelog<http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/writelog>
>>>>> WriteLog on the web: http://www.writelog.com/
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Subject: Digest Footer
>
> _______________________________________________
> WriteLog mailing list
> WriteLog@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/writelog
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> End of WriteLog Digest, Vol 117, Issue 3
> ****************************************
>
_______________________________________________
WriteLog mailing list
WriteLog@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/writelog
WriteLog on the web: http://www.writelog.com/
|