Dave et al,
The renumbering of the WL log is for my personal (i.e., in the shack)
vanity :-)
As it happens, and this was fascinating to me, the WL->CBR translation
within WL put everything right.
.. and thanks, Dave, for the results et al. I didn't do as well this
year (about 30 Qs less...), but had a lot more dupes due to a late,
busted spot during a run. Haven't quite gotten used to the "log it
anyway and move on" mode! OTOH< it really is worth it. 160 is a lot of
fun!
Will be on for the ARRL DX and 160 SSB... hope to have fixed the RX
antennas by then!
73,
Eric W3DQ
Washington, DC
Dave L. Thompson wrote:
> If you are talking about the CQ 160 CW just leave it alone. It might
> mess up the log checker program but assume you are no where near the 30
> hour mark.
>
> I just sent the 2006 results and certificates to AD8P. Bill will issue
> you 2 certificates for 2006 and I am still gathering changes to be
> published in CQ.
> 73 Dave K4JRB
>
> On Thu, 01 Feb 2007 02:11:53 -0500 Eric Rosenberg <wd3q@starpower.net>
> writes:
>
>> Can I/how do I:
>>
>> - insert the right QSO now out of sequence (mistakenly deleted and
>> then
>> re-inserted later, out of sequence due to the time I inserted it) in
>> the
>> right place in the log.
>> - re-number the entire log from 1->
>>
>> 73 + Thanks,
>>
>> Eric W3DQ
>> Washington, DC
>> _______________________________________________
>> WriteLog mailing list
>> WriteLog@contesting.com
>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/writelog
>> WriteLog on the web: http://www.writelog.com/
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
>
_______________________________________________
WriteLog mailing list
WriteLog@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/writelog
WriteLog on the web: http://www.writelog.com/
|