WriteLog
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [WriteLog] USING PRO 2 VS PRO 3

To: jjreisert@alum.mit.edu
Subject: Re: [WriteLog] USING PRO 2 VS PRO 3
From: "Richard Zalewski" <dick.w7zr@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 12 Apr 2006 08:36:06 -0700
List-post: <mailto:writelog@contesting.com>
Thanks for the reply.  I was wondering if the PRO3 module carried some
additional functionality.  I will go ahead and switch after WPX CW.

Tnx
Dick W7ZR
www.w7zr.com

On 4/12/06, Jim Reisert AD1C <jjreisert@alum.mit.edu> wrote:
> --- Richard Zalewski <dick.w7zr@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > When we did not have a choice to use PRO 3 as a radio I used PRO 2 and
> > set my address to 64.  Now that PRO 3 is an available choice I wonder
> > if there is any advantage to changing my pseudo PRO 2 to the real PRO
> > 3.
>
> The rig driver in Writelog is probably the same.
>
> The only advantage I could think of is that if you try to use some other
> software that supports the Pro III, and configure it to talk to a Pro III, the
> software won't work because your radio is now only responding as a Pro II.
>
> I'd switch it back to the correct hex address.
>
> 73 - Jim AD1C
>
>
> --
> Jim Reisert AD1C, 7 Charlemont Court, North Chelmsford, MA 01863
> USA +978-251-9933, <jjreisert@alum.mit.edu>, http://www.ad1c.us
>


--
Tnx es 73
Dick W7ZR
www.w7zr.com
_______________________________________________
WriteLog mailing list
WriteLog@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/writelog
WriteLog on the web:  http://www.writelog.com/

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>