Here is the URL from K5DJs email about the upgrade:
http://www.writelog.com/Downloads/WL1052DUPG.ZIP
Larry L
W0ETC
On Fri, 31 Dec 2004 10:02:12 -0700 "Dick Thompson" <wb0dul@wb0dul.com>
writes:
> Am I missing something here? I went to writelog.com/downloads, and
> I
> see an update called wlognet1052.zip. Is this the 10.52D that is
> being
> mentioned on the reflector? Based on the info regarding this
> upgrade,
> why would anybody install it if there was never any networking that
> might happen on their computer?
>
> It reads:
>
>
> "This patch fixes certain TCP/IP networking crashes. Because the
> bug
> slowly destabilized the system DDE libraries, the symptoms of the
> bug
> were varied and there is no single easy way to reproduce the
> problem
> (which also means there is not 100% certainty that this patch fixes
> all
> problems with TCP/IP networking). However, this patch definitely
> fixes a
> WriteLog TCP/IP networking bug.
>
> This patch must be installed on all machines in a TCP/IP network,
> and it
> will fail to connect to any WriteLog machine running an older
> version.
>
> Instructions:
> With WriteLog not running, unzip the above download into WriteLog's
> \programs directory. It will replace two files: wlognet32.dll and
> wlognetdde.exe."
>
>
> Now, does the average user (home based, no network and no plans for
> such) really need this upgrade? Or is this something that would be
> needed if the operating environment would be SO2R or such? Just
> curious.
>
> Dick
> WB0DUL
>
>
________________________________________________________________________
> ____________________________________________
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: writelog-bounces@contesting.com
> [mailto:writelog-bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of Chris
> Burbanks
> Sent: Friday, December 31, 2004 9:27 AM
> To: writelog@contesting.com
> Subject: [WriteLog] WL 10.52D
>
>
> Now fully working and looking good, except I seems to have lost my
> Help
> file. A real wish for the next version :
>
> Select Number of radios 2, select 2nd radio as sub RX so that sub rx
> freq shows in entry window to the left of the Left/Right indicator
> and
> follows freq when sub rx is tuned. Then when a callsign is keyer
> into
> the Right Log Entry field, it can be worked and stored in the 2nd
> VFO
> bandmap.
>
> This would greatly enhance the technique known as SO1.5R which I use
> in
> the upcoming RSGB AFS Contest. So, Run on say 3525 and S&P on sub
> rx.
> Stations worked or waiting to be worked on the sub rx added to the
> 2nd
> VFO Bandmap would be visible and would be S&P much quicker and more
> efficient. I believe N1MM can do this.
>
> Another very useful enhancement would be to allow stations to be
> spotted
> only to the machines on the network, not for genral consumption.
>
> 73 Chris G3SJJ
> --
> No virus found in this outgoing message.
> Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
> Version: 7.0.296 / Virus Database: 265.6.7 - Release Date: 30-12-04
>
> _______________________________________________
> WriteLog mailing list
> WriteLog@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/writelog
> WriteLog on the web: http://www.writelog.com/
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> WriteLog mailing list
> WriteLog@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/writelog
> WriteLog on the web: http://www.writelog.com/
>
>
_______________________________________________
WriteLog mailing list
WriteLog@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/writelog
WriteLog on the web: http://www.writelog.com/
|