You are correct, Bob, in that Winkey doesn't process PC generated code. It
would if it if was used with logging software that accepted paddle inputs,
which WL doesn't. With WL, it's just working in parallel as a stand alone
keyer. I've never understood the "paddle input" method of manual keying
anyway, as it seems a bit Rube Goldberg-ish. Paralleling the PC and keyer
mechanically seems much simpler to me.
FWIW, my Microkeyer did have some stuttering problems at 32+ WPM that I never
originally experienced with LPT keying, but *I think* I fixed it by fiddling
with settings, unplugging a USB card reader, and plugging the microkeyer into a
different USB port on my machine. I've also found rebooting is a MUST when
changing some settings.
73,
Blake N4GI
----- Original Message -----
From: Bob Henderson <bob@cytanet.com.cy>
> For WinKey to contribute something to the quality of computer
> generated code
> it would need to process an ascii input. I don't believe it gets
> that with
> WL configured for PC generates CW.
>
> I hope someone can show me to be wrong on this because just now
> I'm feeling
> kinda disappointed!
>
> Bob
>
> Bob Henderson, 5B4AGN, P3F
> Giolou, Pafos, Cyprus
> Email: bob@cytanet.com.cy
> http://www.5b4agn.net
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> WriteLog mailing list
> WriteLog@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/writelog
> WriteLog on the web: http://www.writelog.com/
>
_______________________________________________
WriteLog mailing list
WriteLog@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/writelog
WriteLog on the web: http://www.writelog.com/
|