This info is of course "a day late" however, the
abbreviations were/are also available on the CQP Web site
here:
http://www.cqp.org/Counties-Abbreviations.html
Nice list but I found the "Print Friendly" version (a PDF
file linked on that same page) to be the best option for my
own use. I printed them out to make the translation from the
spoken county names a little easier although some CA ops
were giving the abbreviation as part of their SSB exchange.
The PDF file is here:
http://www.cqp.org/pdf/county_abbreviations.pdf
73
Patrick
W7TMT
-----Original Message-----
From: writelog-bounces@contesting.com
[mailto:writelog-bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of
Richard Zalewski
Sent: Monday, October 04, 2004 10:23 AM
To: Clive Whelan; writelog@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [WriteLog] CQP..WL anomalies
You do have access to the correct abbreviations by going to
contest and show multipliers. I keep this window open
during contest.
Dick W7ZR
----- Original Message -----
From: "Clive Whelan" <clive.whelan@btinternet.com>
To: <writelog@contesting.com>
Sent: Monday, October 04, 2004 9:48 AM
Subject: [WriteLog] CQP..WL anomalies
> I had two problems, one of which might not be a WL issue,
the other
> certainly is.
>
>
> 1. Several stations sent county codes greater than 4
letters, which then
> spilled over from cty1 to cty2. An example was PLACER. I
have no idea what
> this represents, since I have no access to accepted county
codes. Someone
> else sent PLAC, which I assume is correct, and is one and
the same thing?
I
> assume that the rules do state a four letter code to be
sent, and WL
> reflects this?
>
>
> 2. More seriously, and in need of a fix I think, was that
when a 4 digit
> serial number was sent, the cursor jumped automatically to
the county
field,
> by which time my reflex action had already "spaced" to
that field, then
> ending up in cty2 field, which required manual editing
which was tedious.
I
> did get the hang of this, but don't think the cursor
should really jump
like
> that ( Wayne?).
>
> Nice opening on 21Mhz around 17z +/-. Signals varied from
S9+ to barely
> readable. Are there really W6s running 100w watts and
G5RVs!!
>
>
> 73
>
>
> Clive
>
> _______________________________________________
> WriteLog mailing list
> WriteLog@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/writelog
> WriteLog on the web: http://www.writelog.com/
>
>
_______________________________________________
WriteLog mailing list
WriteLog@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/writelog
WriteLog on the web: http://www.writelog.com/
_______________________________________________
WriteLog mailing list
WriteLog@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/writelog
WriteLog on the web: http://www.writelog.com/
|