Thanks, Steve.
After following your suggestion, and getting Setup / Ports corrected from my
revisions to INI, I then renamed FPORT16.exe back to its original. Not sure
what else it does, but it did not overwrite the INI file. Everything works
fine.
73,
Jon
----- Original Message -----
From: "Steve Baron - KB3MM" <SteveBaron@StarLinX.com>
To: "Jon Harder" <jon@praxisworks.org>; "Writelog" <writelog@contesting.com>
Sent: Thursday, August 01, 2002 14:29
Subject: Re: [WriteLog] LPT CW in WL via UserPort in XP - solving the
addressing problem
> Those INI files entries are populated by FPORT16.exe. Just rename the
file
> and make your own entries.
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Jon Harder" <jon@praxisworks.org>
> To: "Writelog" <writelog@contesting.com>
> Sent: Thursday, August 01, 2002 12:19
> Subject: [WriteLog] LPT CW in WL via UserPort in XP - solving the
addressing
> problem
>
>
> > For those who may have tried UserPort without instant success, there's
one
> > more wrinkle to consider before giving up. If your Setup/Ports dialog
> > doesn't
> > show what you expect, some cut and try experimenting may be worth a
shot.
> >
> > When it starts, WL appears to overwrite any manual entries made in
> > WriteLog.INI section that designates the addresses of LPT ports. This
> means
> > that the Setup / Ports dialog does not necessarily reflect what is
really
> > going on in your machine.
> >
> > Here's an extract from my INI file --
> >
> > [Ports]
> > LPT1=0x3bc
> > LPT2=0x378
> > LPT3=0x278
> >
> > This is not what is reported in the Device Manager, and no amount of
> manual
> > editing will permanently change these settings! Wonder why?
> >
> > In getting UserPort going, even after completing its own dialog for the
> > actual address of the LPT port I wished to use for CW -- LPT 1 at
> 378-37F,
> > I found that my editing of WriteLog.INI to show this address for LPT 1
> was
> > repeatedly overwritten when WL started up. The INI file would be
> > overwritten to show this desired address of 378 to be what it calls LPT
2.
> > ( While I do have an actual LPT 2 for my printer, it's a PCI add-on, and
> XP
> > shows its address as B400. Furthermore, WL.INI would persistently show
> LPT
> > 1 as at 3BC, and an LPT 3 listed at 278. )
> >
> > The work-around, at least in my case, was to tell the Setup / Ports
dialog
> > that I was using "LPT 2" for CW, so it would look at the correct address
> of
> > 378 where LPT 1 actually is. Then it would key as expected. No
> > conflicts resulted with the printer on the real LPT2. Kind of
confusing,
> > but WL will use the driver if you coax it a bit. I also restarted
> > UserPort.exe and reset the address to use as the 200-37F -- that opens
up
> > the full range of LPT choices in Setup/Ports.
> >
> > So, if your Ports dialog doesn't show what you expect, some cut and try
> > experimenting may be worthwhile. Recall that for some weeks, WL's
> > counting of serial ports was off by one, and we survived that. 8)
> >
> > 73,
> >
> > Jon K1US
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Stan Staten" <n3hs@qsl.net>
> > To: "Writelog" <writelog@contesting.com>
> > Sent: Wednesday, July 31, 2002 23:02
> > Subject: RE: [WriteLog] LPT Keying / Windows 2000 using UserPort
> >
> >
> > > I just tried it and had a different experience. Running XP Pro on
> Athlon
> > > 1500 512MB RAM. When I tried it with it's default port addresses, I
was
> > > able to access all 3 LPT ports in the Writelog Ports Setup screen.
> > However,
> > > doing so on any of them didn't get LPT CW keying to work. Then went
> back
> > > and put in only the address as shown in the control panel for the LPT
> > (i.e.
> > > the standard 0378 - 037F Hex) and only LPT2 was available for checking
> in
> > > Writelog - curious.
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > WriteLog mailing list
> > WriteLog@contesting.com
> > http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/writelog
> >
>
>
>
|