WriteLog
[Top] [All Lists]

[WriteLog] VHF/UHF contests

To: <writelog@contesting.com>
Subject: [WriteLog] VHF/UHF contests
From: W0eea@aol.com (W0eea@aol.com)
Date: Mon, 24 Jun 2002 08:57:18 EDT
Hello WriteLog users,

The following is a list of 'bugs' in the ARRL UHF Contest module,  the ARRL 
VHF QSO Party module and/or the ARRL VHF Sweepstakes module.  Some of these
have been noted by myself and others here and in direct communications with
the appropriate WriteLog authors.  I'd really appreciate it if some or
all of this was dealt with before the next contest(s) for the modules in 
question.  If that is too soon for the authors,  I would also be willing to 
donate my own time to debugging the existing module scripts (I'm told they 
are in C++.) if the uncompiled scripts are available.  
(I don't want to reinvent the wheel however.)

Bugs:

1)  Call sign duping - W1AW,   W1AW/R,  and F6/W1AW are duped as 
    separate staions.  [Only the actual call sign should be dup checked.]

2)  Beam Heading window - As soon as a Grid Square is entered in the Call 
Sign
    Entry window,  bearing and distance to that location should appear.
    [Your own location should use the full 6 character grid,  and the 
calculation 
    should allow for the station being worked to give either 4 or 6.]

3)  Cabrillo File generator should limit information on the 'Catagory:' line 
to
    actual allowed classes of entry.  [UHF: Single Operator Low Power,  
Single 
    Operator High Power,  Rover,  Multioperator][VHF: add to above: Single
    Operator Portable,  Limited Multioperator] [While single band awards are
    given out,  single band is not a listed class of entry.]

4)  VHF contest modules only:  type in a call sign without hitting the 
space-bar
    and QSOs made with that call appear in the Check Call window,  except for
    QSOs on 6 meters.  To see if you have worked someone on 6 meters you have
    to hit the spacebar.  Then a dup will be indicated in the Check Call
    window (and if the frequency in the computer is set to 6 meters also in 
the
    Call Entry window).  However as soon as you hit 'enter' to log a QSO 
    (on any band for that call sign),  the dup info in the Check Call window
    for a 6 meter contact disappears again.  [Dup info should be uniformly
    available.]

5)  This 'bug' was noted in the ARRL VHF QSO Party module.  I assume it can 
be
    found in the others,  but I haven't checked.  Properly duped contacts 
    became improperly handled when marked as 'unclaimed'.  (We operated
    6 bands in June but originally were going to file as a Limited Multi-
    operator station.  When we marked the contacts we could not claim 
    for score in that class as 'unclaimed' the Cabrillo File generator
    changed some of the unclaimed QSOs into marked dups.  It then 
    deleted the QSO points for the 'unclaimed' contacts,  but did not delete 
    grids worked from the totals.  It therefore also calculated the score 
    wrongly.) [ARRL requests that Cabrillo logs list the unclaimed contacts
    for check log purposes.  The unclaimed contacts were not in the Cabrillo
    log made by the generator.  I have not looked at the Cabrillo log specs
    to see how they are supposed to be listed yet 'unclaimed,' but there must 

    be a way to do so since they are asking for them.]

6)  The correct frequency for a typical red diode laser is listed on several
    webs sites that sell them as being in the area of 474 THz,  not 
    300000 MHz.  [Green ???]  
    [Hey ARRL is green another band?] <-- Just kidding although red and green
    are probably farther apart in MHz than any two regular ham bands.

Additional features I'd like to see added to the VHF/UHF contest modules:

1)  A VHF stations worked database that would remember antenna bearing and
    bands worked from one contest to another.  [This is not cheating.  The 
    information in this database would be only that which is available to
    the station which generated it.  A case might be made however that 
    sharing this information between stations (in the manner that super-
    check partial callsigns are shared) would be cheating,  at least for
    single ops.]  [Change the color in the Check Call window of bands 
    worked in previous contests.]  (The only program I've ever known of
    that stored this information was the one I wrote when the computer
    I was logging with used a Z80 for a processor and DBaseII for the
    programming language.  I've missed it ever since we went to CT soon
    after it came on the market.  Now that we've found a better program
    its time to get it back.)

2)  For most of the country the initial frequency listed on each band
    might as well be the calling frequency for that band (i.e. 144200 and
    10368100) rather than the lower band edge.  It seems that's where 
    everyone operates anyway.  Many of us operate narrowband radios 
    on all these bands and the exact pass frequency is needed,  not 
    just 10000M(Hz).  [For VHF/UHF it probably would be better to start at 
    MHz not KHz.]  (For many of us the rigs on many of the bands
    in VHF and UHF contests are IF rigs which are too old to have ports
    for frequency info on the net.  Yet passing is easier if the real 
frequency
    appears than just a band indicator.  Yes we can all enter the info
    from the keyboard.  I'm just trying to save a few moments of set up time
    on each band.  As for frequency info from the rigs themselves,  at a 
    multioperator station with separate radios for each band up to 48 GHz 
plus
    lasers,  the number of computers,  ports,  and level converters gets a 
bit 
    costly.)

BTW nothing in this message is to be taken as a indication that we are 
unhappy
in any way with the principals (authors and distributors) of WriteLog.  This 
is 
by far the best logging software for contests that we have seen or used.  The 

ease and reliability of networking with WriteLog makes any problems it has
very minor compared with every other logger we have tried.  But any program
can be improved.  Also I'm not using the 'royal' we in this message.  I'm 
writing for a group of hams who contest from multioperator stations regularly 
and
where I used 'we' I meant all of us.  Where it was only me I used 'I'...

73 for now,

Jim
w0eea@aol.com


--- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts ---
multipart/alternative
  text/plain (text body -- kept)
  text/html
---

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>