I am assuming that absolutely nobody has successfully run
the simulator in 10.31? Any successes?
> -----Original Message-----
> From: writelog-admin@contesting.com
> [mailto:writelog-admin@contesting.com]On Behalf Of Scot Herrick
> Sent: Thursday, April 18, 2002 18:08
> To: Roger E. Marrotte; writelog@contesting.com
> Cc: Ron Stailey
> Subject: RE: [WriteLog] 10.31 Simulator
>
>
> Hi Roger,
>
> I had the same problem with the message of 'WriteLog not
> running.' I also
> had downloaded the VBRUNx. However, I was on Windows 98, so
> it does not
> appear to me to be an operating system problem.
>
> I also do not have WriteLog installed in the 'default' directory of
> ham\writelog. I have it in 'amateur\writelog.' Perhaps it
> doesn't see it
> running (in spite of me having WriteLog all over my computer screen!)
> because it is looking for the default directory and it's not
> there. Where's
> yours located?
>
> For others, the simulator was originally done to help stress test the
> program. You could load in some really big logs and have
> WriteLog go to work
> on it, especially in beta testing, to know that for your
> station it would
> handle all the functions (remember the 'slowness' of the
> program after 2000
> QSO's? Like that). Once we see this in operation, I'm sure us
> adventurous
> amateurs will figure out other uses for it.
>
> I did not have the opportunity to beta test this upgrade due
> to a family
> situation where I had to travel to NJ, otherwise I would have
> hit this one
> in beta testing. You can't catch them all....
>
> CU...Scot, K9JY
>
> See K9JY's WriteLog User Support Site at:
> http://www.k9jy.com
> mailto:scot@k9jy.com
> That made no change. I think I already had it installed
> anyway. I'm running
> Windows XP Pro. Maybe that's the problem, otherwise I'm out of ideas.
>
> Roger, W1EM
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> WriteLog mailing list
> WriteLog@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/writelog
>
|