> Looking at the Cabrillo log I have from Writelog, I can't really see WHAT
is
> missing (or superfluous?) in the log, except perhaps the actual time of
the
> logged QSO (as opposed to the TIME you sent!).
> With WF1B last year, three TIME's were involved in the exhange: The two
that
> formed part of the exchange, and the actual TIME that the QSO was entered
> into the log. With Writelog, I note that it logs the QSO with the time
that
> was sent as part of the exhange. Now, that COULD be very different, and
was
> in a couple of instances here!
>
> John (GW4SKA), can you tell us WHAT is wrong with the WL Cabrillo logs?
The
> reason I ask is that I wonder if there is a variation between the
different
> versions that will have been used. I used 10.30B, but I know some used
older
> versions than that.
>
> Very best 73 to all
> Phil GU0SUP
Phil, I was told the sent time was missing; here is an excerpt from my
Cabrillo file and I guess I don't understand whats missing:
START-OF-LOG: 2.0
ARRL-SECTION: WPA
CALLSIGN: WW3S
CATEGORY: SINGLE-OP ALL LOW RTTY
CLAIMED-SCORE: 473976
CLUB: North Coast Contesters
CONTEST: BARTG-RTTY
CREATED-BY: WriteLog V10.30B
NAME: Jamie Tolbert
ADDRESS: 21986 Russet Dr.
ADDRESS: Meadville PA 16335
OPERATORS: WW3S
SOAPBOX:
QSO: 21095 RY 2002-03-16 0303 WW3S 599 1 RD0C 599 048
0302
QSO: 21082 RY 2002-03-16 0308 WW3S 599 2 JA7IC 599 022
0307
QSO: 21081 RY 2002-03-16 0310 WW3S 599 3 JG3OYH 599 031
0308
QSO: 21079 RY 2002-03-16 0311 WW3S 599 4 JK1VXE 599 007
0311
QSO: 21079 RY 2002-03-16 0313 WW3S 599 5 UA0BHC 599 020
0313
QSO: 21079 RY 2002-03-16 0314 WW3S 599 6 JL6HKJ 599 031
0313
QSO: 21079 RY 2002-03-16 0317 WW3S 599 7 W7DPW 599 019
0317
QSO: 21079 RY 2002-03-16 0322 WW3S 599 8 JA2AXB 599 021
0321
QSO: 21079 RY 2002-03-16 0322 WW3S 599 9 K7DBU 599 021
0322
QSO: 21079 RY 2002-03-16 0323 WW3S 599 10 RV9BB 599 021
0323
Isn't the sent time there? Or is it the robot doesn't recognize it?
73 Jamie WW3S
|