And does RITTY ever work state of the art!!! I just got the latest version,
4.53, and it is still better on weak signals...I know free is good, but if
you want to copy weak signals, RITTY is the has the edge over
everything....yes including the HAL ST8000. If I hadn't run RITTY and the
8000 side by side for 3 months....I wouldn't believe it myself...but it is
a fact.
RITTY does need an ISA SB16 ($20) slot that is now again available on the
Asus CUV4X ($110). If I didn't have an ISA slot(s), I would change
motherboards just to be able to run RITTY.
If anyone wants screen shots of the signal by side comparisons in WriteLog,
email me directly, gbright@bellsouth.net and I will send out some "no s
meter movement" prints.
73s
Grant
W4OJC
----- Original Message -----
From: "Jim Reisert AD1C" <jjreisert@alum.mit.edu>
To: <n3wt@juno.com>; <writelog@contesting.com>
Sent: Sunday, August 05, 2001 12:00 PM
Subject: Re: [WriteLog] interface with RITTY, version 3.06
> On Wed, 1 Aug 2001 23:08:05 -0400, n3wt@juno.com wrote:
>
> >Has anyone been able to interface WriteLog with RITTY, version 3.06 by
> >K6STI? If so, how ya do that? I thought Writelog would work with
RITTY,
> >but I think a later version of RITTY is required. I can start the
> >program, but it always goes to a full screen in the DOS mode of RITTY
and
> >will not operate in a window screen.
>
> You need RITTY 4.50 or higher. There was an upgrade fee - contest
> Brian at K6STI@n2.net for details.
>
> 73 - Jim AD1C
>
|