I'll third that, and fast too, plus you can see what
frequency the other stations tones are. It is neat to watch
the waterfall move as the AFC works. I get more precise
tuning with MMTTY than with my Kenwood scope on the really
weak ones. For qrm, I use a DSP59 in front of the soundcard
with center frequency for rtty and close the bandwidth down
to 200hz. It is interesting to see that clearly displayed in
MMTTY.
Grant
W4OJC
----- Original Message -----
From: "Steve Dyer" <sdyer@interlogue.com>
To: <w9gm@arrl.net>; "Writelog" <Writelog@contesting.com>
Sent: Sunday, April 01, 2001 20:27 PM
Subject: RE: [WriteLog] Spectrum type tuning display
>
> I'll second that. I think the display in MMTTY is the
easiest to tune with.
>
> Steve
> W1SRD
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: owner-writelog@contesting.com
> > [mailto:owner-writelog@contesting.com]On Behalf Of Ken
Weigel
> > Sent: Sunday, April 01, 2001 11:48 AM
> > To: Writelog
> > Subject: [WriteLog] Spectrum type tuning display
> >
> >
> >
> > I was wondering if there is any plans for the addition
of a spectrum
> > type tuning display on writelog? I have operated a few
contests using
> > MMTTY and the spectrum type tuning aid along with the
traditional
> > crossed cigars are great. I am not sure why they also
have a waterfall
> > type, when the other two are all you would need.
> >
> > 73,
> > Ken W9GM
> >
> >
> > --
> > WWW: http://www.writelog.com/
> > Submissions: writelog@contesting.com
> > Administrative requests:
writelog-REQUEST@contesting.com
> > Problems: owner-writelog@contesting.com
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> WWW: http://www.writelog.com/
> Submissions: writelog@contesting.com
> Administrative requests: writelog-REQUEST@contesting.com
> Problems: owner-writelog@contesting.com
>
>
--
WWW: http://www.writelog.com/
Submissions: writelog@contesting.com
Administrative requests: writelog-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems: owner-writelog@contesting.com
|