VHFcontesting
[Top] [All Lists]

[VHFcontesting] A Request for all who try high VHF Aurora contacts

To: "NEWSVHF@mailman.qth.net" <NEWSVHF@mailman.qth.net>, "vhfcontesting@contesting.com" <vhfcontesting@contesting.com>, "222 >> 222Activity@groups.io" <222Activity@groups.io>
Subject: [VHFcontesting] A Request for all who try high VHF Aurora contacts
From: Dave Olean <k1whs@metrocast.net>
Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2026 13:50:01 -0500
List-post: <mailto:vhfcontesting@contesting.com>

Hello VHFers,

I have been ruminating about the mechanics of Auroral contacts. Well, maybe not exactly ruminating, but I have been trying to think about it!  Aurora is a lot like billiards. The take off azimuth has a lot to do with what you work. I have been actively writing down beam headings along with my logging data for my recent AU contacts. This is an attempt to actually determine  the mechanics of each contact. Beam directivities increase on the higher frequencies. Most six meter contacts are made with beams that are too wide to give an accurate reading, but some 144 antennas and 222 MHz antennas can be quite precise.  Back in the 1980's I used a 144 MHz EME array on Aurora. It was very difficult as I had a heck of a time keeping signals within the beamwidth of the array. It was 5.9 E X 9.0 H degrees.  Still, it was interesting to peak signals up. Most would peak at 275to 310 degrees if they were well off to my West. Stations down South peaked more northerly and I found that some stations benefited from me having some elevation cranked in. Most long distance signals to the West were on the horizon. Any elevation made things worse.  Anyway, I am asking that you try to write down your beam headings for each contact if at all possible. I am trying to tabulate Auroral contacts in an effort to maximize results for everyone in the future. Knowing the beam headings is crucial.

Every Aurora is different. The one thing that is constant is that the scattering mechanism is at about 100 to 120 km above the Earth in the E region. Visual Auroras are much more widespread than the actual radio Aurora. Both are influenced by the magnetic field lines in your area. The geomagnetic latitude is important as is the magnetic dip angle. It all varies depending on your location. Path loss can vary by the inverse square law up to and back from the scattering point. There is also a large loss as the angle of the arriving wave departs from the perpendicular to the magnetic field. I am trying to sort this all out, but I need some beam headings from both ends of the contact to plot contacts.  The proper beam heading can vary depending on where the other station is aimed. Headings can vary depending on the N-S thickness of the Auroral belt and it's geographic latitude. A stronger Aurora will be seen farther to the South.

I have been in communication with physicists at the Space Science Center at the University of New Hampshire, which is about a half hour drive from my house. They do lots of magnetic field experiments with rockets and satellites, plus they have a program here in New England where they are building a network of flux gate magnetometers  in northern New England.  I will probably update my old magnetometer here and join that network over the next year or so, They have gotten a lot more sophisticated than I was back in 1994 when I first installed my magnetometer. My hope is that I can get some experienced eyes to look over the Aurora  data  and point me in the right direction. I figure that radio data can be an important part of any Auroral study.

Things to consider with Auroral storms: The line of sight distance to your radio horizon is about 1250 km. This is the farthest North that you will see any scattering assuming a 120 km scattering height. On strong Auroras, there may be scattering points much closer or even to your South. (That can be bad!) The good news is that we in mid latitude areas will almost never be totally North of the AU. The farther East or West you turn your antenna. opens up more DX opportunities if the station on the other end is doing likewise. The actual heading will depend on where the Auroral scattering points are. These can be rather small areas, so that a sharper beam can improve the S/N ratio. The downside is that sharp beams can mean that the scattering point will appear to move!

So, If you have any azimuth data from previous sessions, please let me know. If we get an Aurora in the near future, please note your azimuths and send that along. I will try to match things up and try make sense of it all.

73

Dave K1WHS

Also see: https://directivesystems.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2014/04/Magnetometer.pdf


_______________________________________________
VHFcontesting mailing list
VHFcontesting@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/vhfcontesting
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>