I guess this will generate *some* discussion. :-)
I think allowing 3 modes of contacts on each band should help increase
activity, the number of contacts, and overall fun. Let's go for it!
Different point values do make some sense, but I'm not sure there can ever be a
solid consensus as to the mode point values. For instance, your analysis
emphasizes the speed of each contact ... which makes sense for a major multiop
where contact rate is very important. I would argue, for instance, that CW
should count for *less* than voice because it gives a 3-6db or so advantage
over SSB ... which is much more important for typical VHF contest stations. The
same thing applies to fast digital ... even more of an effective power
advantage over CW so it should count for less.
Since it will be hard to get a consensus in the VHF community on different
point values for different modes, I *strongly* believe having different point
values should be deferred. Instead first simply allow 3 mode contacts worth one
point each and see how it works out in practice.
As to "manufactured contacts": that's a problem I hadn't considered before.
However, I think it would be simpler to require a minimum time between contacts
on the same band rather than spread out the activity for conventional modes. It
would be easy enough to move from a solid voice contact to meeting up at an
agreed frequency in the CW portion of the band.
In summary:1) A big enthusiastic thumbs-up to 3 modes per band.2) Keep it
simple and defer consideration of different mode point values.3) Don't change
the traditional mix of terrestrial CW and voice in the same band portion. If
necessary, require a minimum time between contacts in a band.
Thanks for taking the considerable to write this up and submit it formally.
[This is my personal opinion only. I have no idea how my fellow club members
feel in the aggregate, but I hope we (PackRats) respond as a club after "some"
debate.]
-- Pete K0BAK (/R)
On Monday, March 16, 2020, 07:21:37 PM EDT, Bob, W3IDT <w3idt@comcast.net>
wrote:
I have sent the following discussion and proposal for VHF Contest Rule
Changes to appropriate ARRL and CQ contest personnel. If you are
interested in the future of VHF contests, please read carefully and
offer your considered opinions and alternate recommendations.
{ rest of proposal elided - PK }
_______________________________________________
VHFcontesting mailing list
VHFcontesting@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/vhfcontesting
|