VHFcontesting
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [VHFcontesting] Ontario QSO Party

To: vhfcontesting@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [VHFcontesting] Ontario QSO Party
From: Dan via VHFcontesting <vhfcontesting@contesting.com>
Reply-to: k1to@aol.com
Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2018 12:29:42 -0400
List-post: <mailto:vhfcontesting@contesting.com>
There are actually many well-thought-out reasons for not including 80M in the 
FQP.  Not quite sure why labeling that "dumb" on a VHF reflector is 
appropriate.  

 
Dan K1TO

 

 

-----Original Message-----
From: Buddy Morgan via VHFcontesting <vhfcontesting@contesting.com>
To: vhfcontesting <vhfcontesting@contesting.com>
Sent: Fri, Apr 20, 2018 11:22 am
Subject: Re: [VHFcontesting] Ontario QSO Party


 A couple of comments: 

Unless we have an E skip opening, there is no way that I'm working Ontario, on 
VHF. But thank the powers that be, for making the VHF and UHF bands part of the 
contest. In contrast, here in Florida, the Florida QSO party, next weekend, is 
40M ~10M, only. Can't even work 80M, much less 160 or VHF. Kind of dumb, in my 
opinion. But, I don't see it changing. 

I find it interesting that Ontario and Michigan have contests, the same 
weekend. I would think that this would generate a lot of QRM, in the 
Ontario/Michigan area?

Buddy WB4OMG
EL 98

 


_______________________________________________
VHFcontesting mailing list
VHFcontesting@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/vhfcontesting

_______________________________________________
VHFcontesting mailing list
VHFcontesting@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/vhfcontesting

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>