VHFcontesting
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [VHFcontesting] FT8 and Up

To: <vhfcontesting@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [VHFcontesting] FT8 and Up
From: Steve Kavanagh via VHFcontesting <vhfcontesting@contesting.com>
Reply-to: Steve Kavanagh <sjkavanagh1@yahoo.ca>
Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2018 03:50:01 +0000 (UTC)
List-post: <mailto:vhfcontesting@contesting.com>
Herb

I made one FT8 QSO on 432 upon request from a station around 40-50 km away.  
Signal was good - it would have been easy copy on CW, maybe on SSB.  But FT8 
had a hard time copying, though it eventually worked after quite a few repeats. 
 It wasn't hard to see the problems....you know what 432 tropo/troposcatter 
signals sound like...lots of fading, multiple aircraft- and other- scatter 
signals on different frequencies (some of them drifting), etc.  Much of the 
time the different scatter signals' bandwidths overlapped and interfered with 
each other.

I wouldn't recommend it - FT8 seems to be out of its element, though it was 
interesting to see all the various different frequency components of the signal 
on the waterfall!

73,
Steve VE3SMA
_______________________________________________
VHFcontesting mailing list
VHFcontesting@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/vhfcontesting

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>