I've been curious about these, but not enough to buy one. Schematics are
available on-line. Looking them over, I see they contain "older"
technology. If I were to design one of them these days, I'd use somewhat
different parts and configurations.
I use the W1VT no-tune transverter for 222 MHz. It uses three boards - one
for the 194 MHz LO and two identical boards that can be configured for
transmit or receive. They also allow several possible configurations on
receive depending on whether you're in a high-RF environment or not. They
are excellent performers. An additional power module gives me 10 watts
output.
By the way, this eBay sale is for the same module I use. I bought one to
have a spare. Very good price and the one I got works fine. You can squeeze
more than 10 watts out of them, but I throttle it back because I'm QRP
Portable in most contests.
It's eBay item 351966348973.
73, Zack W9SZ
On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 8:50 AM, James Duffey <jamesduffey@comcast.net>
wrote:
> In preparation for the January ARRL VHF contest, W7QQ had two of the
> Transverters Store’s 222MHz transverters in his shack. These are the
> inexpensive, $125 fully assembled and packaged, less as boards,
> transverters available on eBay or from the manufacturer.
>
> As the reports of the transmit quality of these units are varied, some say
> they are OK, others say that the transmit quality is horrible, we decided
> to look at the transmit properties of the transverters. A short description
> of the results of those measurements are on the NM VHF Society Page:
>
> < http://www.nmvhf.org/technical.html >
>
> We found that one of the units had acceptable IMD performance and one unit
> was poor. This would explain the mixed reports. Upon further investigation,
> we found that the unit with poorer IMD performance had a lower final gate
> bias, 2.8V, than the good unit had at 3.1V. When the gate bias on the unit
> with the poor performance was increased to 3.1V, its performance
> substantially improved. The paper shows how the adjustment, which is
> straight forward, was done.
>
> Here are the IMD test results on the two units:
>
> Transverter 3rd order IMD Performance
> Power Out (watts) Unit One Unit Two (after bias adjustment)
> 7.5 -12 dB -10 db
> 5 -20 dB -18dB
> 2.5 -28 dB -24 dB
>
> Two of the locals ran theses two units in the January ARRL contest and
> their signals sounded fine on the air.
>
> If you have one of these units, or are going to purchase one make sure
> that the final gate bias is set to 3.1Vdc or greater prior to putting it on
> the air. If you have a spectrum analyzer, you can look at the IMD while
> changing the final gate bias, if not, set it to 3.1Vdc according to the
> instructions in the paper. If it is already 3.1Vdc or greater, you are
> probably OK. There is probably room for further improvement as the internal
> settings for the drive potentiometer and the variable inductors on the two
> units differed. When we get the opportunity, we will look at this closer.
>
> If the power is kept below 5W, these should be acceptable on the air. If
> you are driving an amplifier, then you should probably keep the drive to
> 2.5W or less.
>
> The transverter boards for all of the VHF/UHF bands are similar, but we
> did not make measurements on transverters for other bands. I would expect
> the results to be similar, but not identical. If you have one of these
> units and measure the gate bias, I would like to know what it was before
> and after adjusting it. - Duffey KK6MC
>
> --
> KK6MC
> James Duffey
> Cedar Crest NM
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> VHFcontesting mailing list
> VHFcontesting@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/vhfcontesting
>
_______________________________________________
VHFcontesting mailing list
VHFcontesting@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/vhfcontesting
|